Are Small-Scale Environmental-Protection Efforts a Waste of Time? - Fine Homebuilding

previous
  • 7 Small Bathroom Layouts
    7 Small Bathroom Layouts
  • Clever daily tip in your inbox
    Clever daily tip in your inbox
  • 7 Smart Kitchen Solutions
    7 Smart Kitchen Solutions
  • Hot Water Now
    Hot Water Now
  • Energy-Smart Details
    Energy-Smart Details
  • 9 Concrete Countertops Ideas
    9 Concrete Countertops Ideas
  • Magazine Departments
    Magazine Departments
  • Read FHB on Your iPad
    Read FHB on Your iPad
  • Basement Remodeling Tips
    Basement Remodeling Tips
  • Custom Flooring Inspiration
    Custom Flooring Inspiration
  • Video: Install a Fence
    Video: Install a Fence
  • A New Approach to Classic Cabinets
    A New Approach to Classic Cabinets
  • Remodeling Articles
    Remodeling Articles
  • Master Carpenter Videos
    Master Carpenter Videos
  • 7 Trim Carpentry Secrets
    7 Trim Carpentry Secrets
  • Video Series: Tile a Bathroom
    Video Series: Tile a Bathroom
  • Pro Tool Rental. Learn More.
    Pro Tool Rental. Learn More.
  • All about Roofing
    All about Roofing
  • Tips & Techniques for Painting
    Tips & Techniques for Painting
  • Design Inspiration
    Design Inspiration
next

Editor's Notepad

Editor's Notepad


Are Small-Scale Environmental-Protection Efforts a Waste of Time?

comments (2) November 8th, 2011 in Blogs
ScottG Scott Gibson, contributing writer


GreenBuildingAdvisor senior editor Martin Holladay came across a column in The New York Times that got him thinking. The subject? Whether the actions that indivdiuals take on a personal level really help curbing carbon emissions and slow the rate of global climate change.


More from greenbuildingadvisor.com

7 Steps to an Energy-Efficient House: 7. Renewable Energy

Photovoltaic (Solar)

Wind-Generated Power

Resisting the Allure of Small Wind Turbines


The columnist contends that nothing indivduals do will have the kind of impact the green-building community would like to see. The problems are just too overwhelming.

Worse, small steps taken by indivduals are actually a distraction from government policy solutions that have a chance at working.

In a Q&A post at GBA, Holladay shares the columnist's basic premise and asks for comment.

That's the subject of this week's Q&A Spotlight.


Read the whole article
at Green Building Advisor



posted in: Blogs, energy efficiency, wind-generated power

Comments (2)

McKennon McKennon writes: Recycling and environment protection efforts are definitely not a waste of time. It may take a lot of resources now and may be costly for a few (even to consumers!) but in the long run, it will save the environment for generations to come. Thus, I don’t believe that it is a waste of time.
Posted: 10:22 pm on October 2nd

brewdesign brewdesign writes: From Wikipedia: "In 2001 the carbon emissions from coal use in China made up about 10% of the world total CO2 emissions at the time.[23] By 2004 this fraction rose to 14%.[24] It is believed that a continued increase in coal power in China may undermine international initiatives to decrease carbon emissions such as the Kyoto Protocol, which called for a decrease of 483 million tons by 2012. In the same time frame, it is expected that coal plants in China will have increased CO2 emissions by 1,926 million tons — over 4 times the proposed reduction.[25]"
Posted: 2:22 pm on November 9th

Log in or create a free account to post a comment.