The Science of Saving Energy - Fine Homebuilding
previous
  • Energy-Smart Details
    Energy-Smart Details
  • Clever daily tip in your inbox
    Clever daily tip in your inbox
  • Video: Build a curved step
    Video: Build a curved step
  • Video: Install a Fence
    Video: Install a Fence
  • Master Carpenter Videos
    Master Carpenter Videos
  • Remodeling in Action
    Remodeling in Action
  • Tips & Techniques for Painting
    Tips & Techniques for Painting
  • All about Roofing
    All about Roofing
  • Basement Remodeling Tips
    Basement Remodeling Tips
  • Magazine Departments
    Magazine Departments
  • 12 Remodeling Secrets
    12 Remodeling Secrets
  • 7 Trim Carpentry Secrets
    7 Trim Carpentry Secrets
  • Gallery: Custom Flooring
    Gallery: Custom Flooring
  • 7 Small Bathroom Layouts
    7 Small Bathroom Layouts
  • 7 Smart Kitchen Solutions
    7 Smart Kitchen Solutions
  • 9 Concrete Countertops Ideas
    9 Concrete Countertops Ideas
  • Slideshow: 12 Stunning Remodels
    Slideshow: 12 Stunning Remodels
  • Read FHB on Your iPad
    Read FHB on Your iPad
  • Design Inspiration
    Design Inspiration
  • Solid Deck-Framing Advice
    Solid Deck-Framing Advice
next

The Deans of Green

The Deans of Green


The Science of Saving Energy

comments (1) August 4th, 2009 in Blogs
Rob_Moody Rob Moody, member

Yep, that’s me. I’m actually doing work. Physical labor. I’m installing a bath fan in the summer in New Orleans. I promise it wasn’t hot or humid.
 Click To Enlarge

Yep, that’s me. I’m actually doing work. Physical labor. I’m installing a bath fan in the summer in New Orleans. I promise it wasn’t hot or humid.

 

Photo: Rob Moody, Organic Think Inc

I’m fresh off of the road attending the US Department of Energy's National Weatherization Training Conference in Indianapolis last week. This was my first trip to the Circle City, and I was pleasantly surprised. Clean, great architecture, nice bars, including an authentic 1897 German Rathskeller beer hall (I went there twice in three days).


I was also surprised by the information presented at one of the conference sessions. Michael Blasnik of Blasnik & Associates in Boston facilitated a session called "How Not to Save Energy." I was excited about the session because I had heard lots of colleagues talk about Blasnik’s research.

Blasnik first explained his basic approach to energy efficiency data analysis: It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s a lot easier without statistics. So he reviews raw data, and lots of it. He analyzes information from as many homes as possible to get a realistic representation of performance without skews for occupant behavior. In the weatherization business, the savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is a hugely important bit of datum. This is an indicator without units: the savings generated divided by the retrofit investment. If the SIR of an improvement is 1 or greater based on a 10-year payback period, it’s good. If the SIR is less than 1, then in some states weatherization assistance funds can be used for the percentage of the investment equivalent to the SIR ratio. For example, if a particular upgrade has a SIR of 2, then for every dollar invested in the upgrade, $2 is saved. If an upgrade has a SIR of .6, then DOE weatherization funds can pay for 60% of the strategy as long as the remainder of the funds are coming from somewhere else.

Blasnik discussed a few trends in residential energy efficiency that make sense. Homes that use a lot of energy have the potential for the most savings. Big energy users equals big energy savers. Low energy users equals low energy savers. This relationship follows around a 15% trendline. To put it another way, average homeowners can save around 15% on energy bills with some simple weatherization techniques, no matter the size of the home and the energy usage. This goes for natural gas and electric baseloads.

There are inaccuracies in what really saves energy and why homes that are weatherized aren’t saving as much as anticipated. Many times, occupant behavior gets the blame when it’s really that the wrong measures were taken to upfit the home. The data that Blasnik has seen over the years does not indicate that occupants altering thermostats is a significant reason behind lower-than-expected savings. The blame game also points the finger at people removing CFLs and low-flow showerheads, but Blasnik’s data shows that this only happens 25% of the time. Some folks blame lower savings on poor workmanship, but Blasnik again shows this to be false. Studies indicate that weatherization crews actually do a pretty good job with upgrades such as insulation installation.

So what is the real culprit? According to Blasnik, the reasons are as follows:

  • The algorithms that are used to calculate the savings are just bad, and this leads to some of the wrong strategies being employed to save energy.
  • The algorithms are outdated and underrepresent equipment efficiencies.
  • The calculations ignore basic physics, assume a high heating balance point, and underestimate heat regain from basements and attics.


Bottom line, the algorithms used to calculate savings only measure the easily measured and implies that more sophisticated analysis is necessary to get to the root of the issue: What does/does not save real energy and real money?


posted in: Blogs, energy efficiency, weatherization, energy modeling

Comments (1)

MikeGuertin MikeGuertin writes: Nice summary report of the session.

It sounds like 1 of two things has to happen in order to figure out which measures work and which ones don't:

More long-term research.

A review of old research to see if the conclusions were valid.

Both take time to conduct and then get the results out to the front-line workers. In the meantime lots of weatherization work is going on and likely to continue for the next few years.

Sounds like a recipe for the same 1970s / early '80s weatherization boom. We think we're doing a good thing things, but we aren't quite sure.


Posted: 8:22 am on August 13th

Log in or create a free account to post a comment.