How Not to Save Energycomments (1) August 18th, 2009 in Blogs
Mythbusters: Home Energy Efficiency Measures That Don’t Save Much Energy
In the last two blog posts, I have written about the problems with inaccurate computer models in determining weatherization strategies and effective home energy improvement measures based on a talk my building scientist Michael Blasnik. At the DOE National Weatherization Training Conference, Blasnik also shared his list of common strategies for home weatherization that don’t save much energy. To keep from wasting time chasing windmills and wasting taxpayer money, the following are strategies to avoid or closely evaluate:
- Furnace Tune Ups. While a safety check is a necessity, annual furnace tune ups don’t show a marked improvement in efficiency according to a study by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Blasnik recommended that a maintenance cycle of 4-5 years is typically adequate unless there are issues with the equipment.
- Sizing Furnace Correctly. Appropriate sizing for cooling systems is critical, but Blasnik says that there is no evidence to support that oversizing a furnace will be a detriment to the efficiency of the unit. Furthermore, oversizing can overcome issues with duct design and duct installation issues. Of course, that’s not a good reason to settle for sloppy workmanship and oversizing furnaces. The take away is that it is not worth the investment to replace an properly functioning, oversized furnace in an existing home.
- Basement Duct Sealing. Sealing ductwork in an uninsulated crawlspace or attic can save 8-15%, but an Ohio study shows only a 0-3% savings with duct sealing in basements. Blasnik felt that these improvements were negligible because for most intents and purposes, basements are inside. Waste heat and leakage from equipment preheats infiltration. He recommends fixing gaping holes, but not to obsess about mastic application.
- Floor Insulation. Adding floor insulation in results in 0-39 therms per year of savings, which calculates to around 25 years for payback. The reasoning for basementsis that they behave more like inside than outside. If there is heating equipment basements, then ambient air is heated by waste heat, which in turn allows for regain in living space above the uninsulated floor. Insulating the floor would eliminate this positive effect on energy bills. Crawl spaces may see slightly more savings than basements when adding floor insulation, especially in very well ventilated crawlspaces with sealed ducts. However that addition can make ductwork even more outside. Alternatively, perimeter wall insulation would be a much cheaper choice and can achieve similar savings.
- Caulking and Weatherstripping. These efforts show minimal savings typically reducing infiltration less than 10% and savings of 0-3%. Blasnik cited a Canadian study that concluded that intensively caulking and weatherstripping extremely leaky windows can save about 0.5 therms per year, equating to around 50 cents.
- Window Replacement. I find this statistic very interesting since I have been a proponent of historic window preservation for years. Replacing windows can result in saving 2-3 therms ($2-3) per year per window per year, resulting in a payback period of over one hundred years. Like all of these caveats, the existing conditions of homes should be scrutinized. Jalousie windows or super leaky windows without storms could see better savings, but adding storm windows is more cost effective with higher savings potential. In the case of cooling, it’s more cost effective to try shading windows with landscaping, solar screens or window film.
- Tankless Gas Water Heaters. Tankless water heaters can save up to 1/3 of a home’s water heating requirements, or 35-75 therms per year. When replacing a tanked water heater, keep in mind that tankless heaters are expensive topping $2000, a 30-40 year payback. When coupled with efficient layout and very low flow fixtures can increase savings and decrease the payback period, especially in new construction. One of the factors that plays into energy costs here: in homes with tankless water heaters, occupant behavior can increase energy usage. Endless hot water for showers and longer wait times at the sink can become the dirty truth in these homes. Most tankless units have a minimum activation flow rate meaning that a trickle of water will not result in hot water coming out of the tap. Very low flow shower heads does not trigger the flame in some instances, and homeowners turn on the bathroom sink to compensate.
- Cooling your Attic. According to Blasnik, you won’t save much by insulating your rafters and cooling the space in the attic, unless your AC ductwork is located up there. In that case savings could be up to 15%. Blasnik says that the absolute worst approach is to add a powered attic ventilation fan to above a leaky ceiling. This will depressurize the attic and, since the ceiling is leaky, the living space of the home. The depressurized home will force warm, moist air into conditioned space by infiltration through holes in the envelope. This can pull air out of the home and result in a warmer indoor environment.
Other things that Blasnik mentioned that don’t save cash:
- Changing Furnace Filters Monthly. Once annually is adequate.
- Opening Refrigerator Quickly and Cleaning Coils.
- Using drapes to insulate windows. This can actually create convective loops in the air space between the window and the drapes.
- Energy saving kits. Two compact fluorescents will not be the answer to your astronomical energy bills.
When improving energy efficiency of existing housing stock, care must be taken to gather the information about each specific home as well as the empirical trends in the science of this industry. The highest and best approach is to gather historical utility data, thoroughly inspect homes, use diagnostic equipment and have the knowledge about what works. The important underpinning of all three of these blogs is really a necessary mindset best recorded by the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Muslims and the societies that followed. Empirical evidence is absolutely necessary to support universal truths. Without the knowledge of that evidence, untruths can be repeated so much by so many people, that they become believed and dogmatic. Every American should understand the scientific method enough to know the importance of seeking truth that is sufficiently supported by evidence. That’s what Blasnik does for us. The trouble with dogma in energy efficiency is that it doesn’t save the planet or anyone’s money. You wouldn’t go to a brain surgeon who learned about cutting through his intuition, so let’s not do that with our homes. Heed Aristotle’s words: Thus it is clear that we must get to know the primary premises by induction; for the method by which even sense-perception implants the universal is inductive. …it follows that there will be no scientific knowledge of the primary premises, and since except intuition nothing can be truer than scientific knowledge, it will be intuition that apprehends the primary premises. …If, therefore, it is the only other kind of true thinking except scientific knowing, intuition will be the originative source of scientific knowledge. Check out these references for some good building science knowledge:
posted in: Blogs, energy efficiency, weatherization
Painter Jim Lacey shares some tips for caulking and painting fiber-cement siding. read more