FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In
Editor's Notepad

Will Double Stud Wall Construction Bring Efficiency at a Modest Cost?

By Scott Gibson
Some builders gang double walls, and then raise them together; others build each half separately. Either way you do it, it's not much different than conventional framing.

Double-stud exterior walls are easy to build; they use affordable,common materials; and they can hold a lot of insulation

If building on a budget seems a common goal, Karen Bean’s situation gets more complicated. She has inherited the foundation on which the house will be built. Designed with more traditional construction in mind, the foundation is in good condition and looks to be well made. But can she adapt a double-wall design to fit it?

Her appeal for ideas is the subject of this week’s Q&A Spotlight.

Double-stud walls can be a cost-effective way of achieving energy efficiency, but suggestions soon follow for a modified Larsen Truss wall system. These foot-thick walls, packed with cellulose, offer high R-values and minimize thermal bridging. Plus, cellulose insulation has some advantages over the blown-in fiberglass Bean has been considering.

As to costs, enlisting friends and family is one way of keeping the budget low. But material choices also play a part. Using rough-sawn lumber from a local mill, and finding a source for salvaged insulation, also will help. So will keeping the house simple, and maybe a little smaller.

Read the whole article at Green Building Advisor.

Further resources

Passive House: The next wave in energy efficiency?

Six proven ways to build energy-smart walls

A net-zero energy house for under $180,000

The future of framing is here

Sign up for eletters today and get the latest how-to from Fine Homebuilding, plus special offers.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Some builders gang double walls, and then raise them together; others build each half separately. Either way you do it, it's not much different than conventional framing.

×

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

New Feature

Fine Homebuilding Forums

Ask questions, offer advice, and share your work

View Comments

  1. sawzall316 | Jan 17, 2011 11:27am | #1

    Ok, How on earth is double walled construction on a single detached family home cost effective? Two by six wall framing with sprayed in foam insulation is very fast and meets or exceeds code and energy efficiency requirement in most locations. Thermo-bridging is effectivly blocked with the addition of rigid foam insulation in the building envelope. Why is double wall framing an issue outside of attached unit housing?

  2. kevern | Jan 17, 2011 11:36am | #2

    I agree Sawzall. Plus this will add to the cost of windows because of extension jambs needed.

  3. cdavidl | Jan 17, 2011 11:59am | #3

    Before one creates a double-studded wall, one might consider the 2 x 6 on 24 in centers method. Probably cheaper than a double studded wall and will take less time to construct. Cost effective and will hold sufficient insulation.

  4. rocketdriver | Jan 17, 2011 01:01pm | #4

    I agree with all three comments. Double stud walls eat up a substantial amount of floorspace when you tally up the entire perimeter. There's a whole lot more labor, and as Kevern says, the window installation becomes much more difficult and the end product is a deeply recessed window, and the associated problem: if you put the window flush on the inside it creates water problems; if you put it flush on the outside you won't have water problems but then you have to reach in about 18" to operate it, and you have that box around it to deal with.
    Wasteful is the one word that stands out in my mind.
    A 2x6 perimeter with blown insulation is way strong enough and allows tons of insulation.

  5. oldstud | Jan 17, 2011 01:25pm | #5

    In 1990, I built a double stud home for my personal residence. My exterior walls extend down to the brick ledge, which insulated the rim joists. (12" block needed for my brick home)
    Costs were higher but I've recouped them and in future my heating bills are still low. We enjoy our deep window sills with the shades inside the jambs which allow the wide oak trim with rosettes in full view.

  6. walt1122 | Jan 17, 2011 06:28pm | #6

    what ever happened to all the talk about using 2 x 4's staggered 16" on center with 2 x 6 top and bottom allowing lots of blown in insulation and a thermal break between the outside wall and the inside conditioned space? Big in the 70's and 80's cause you used standard building practices and materials. think you had to step up to 1/2 inch rock on interior wall for strenght but that was about it.

    thanks

    Walt

  7. TomLuce | Jan 19, 2011 01:17pm | #7

    I am just hearing about this idea, but it seems to have some added benefits and draw backs. The draw backs have already been stated with the reference to the cost of installation of windows and door, time to frame, cost of materials. The major benefit would be the R value, but I can see another benefit; reduction to cost of running mechanical, electrical, or plumbing when needed through exterior walls. I am a big proponent of building for the future as in build-in chases for future electrical, data, cable, etc. By having a wall that already has and opening to run conduit or extra wiring. But this is not a fix all everyone reading this has been around long enough to know the right tool for the right job. That goes with building practices as well, and every area has different requirements. I think it is a practice that will be useful to use but does not need to become a standard practice everywhere.

  8. sawzall316 | Jan 19, 2011 05:54pm | #8

    Oldstud built his own personal house in this 2xwall method, fine, his choice. However, given the option of 24"oc 2x6 framing with 2 to 4" rigid foam on the outside and 5.5" of almost any insulation of choice inside will provide more than a reasonable and competative Rvalue for as far anyone can see. I cannot see where the buider will make money and a customer having less useable room will gladly pay more. This whole idea is nuts. Need I mention that everyone gets taxed on the perceived squarefootage of a home, i.e outside perimiter measurement of a home---yes think about that, you will not get a break because you really have much less living space. In this case less is not more and more is $$$out of everyones pocket.

  9. Tedkidd | Jan 21, 2011 03:54pm | #9

    We place WAY to much importance on r value and way to little on air leakage. Solve footprint, materials, and energy cost in one fell swoop.

    2x4 framing 20-24 on center (engineered) with closed cell spray foam at 3 inches. Spray foam creates tremendous structural rigidity, air seals and insulates all in one step.

  10. User avater
    Dreamcatcher | Jan 21, 2011 04:50pm | #10

    Just one foot thick? Why not two? or Five?

    This is stupid, where does it end? What's the point of having super insulated walls when your windows and doors are just a fraction of that? Heat is lazy, it always finds the path of least resistance. Much wiser to build common 2x4 or 2x6 walls then invest the savings in the highest performance windows and doors.

    Just to add another contrast: Imagine how poor the light dispersion from the windows would be - every window would cast a light beam similar to a skylight and all the wall areas around the windows would be dark and shadowy. Don't understate the importance of using fenestration for lighting purposes ---- that is real "green building".

    DC

  11. Haverlock2022 | Feb 07, 2011 07:45pm | #11

    Some of your comments makes a lot of sense...There truth in all these comments, and I want to add one more...

    What about the European method of 2x8 walls, based on passive house design, triple glazed windows, taping all seams...even without some codes we are suggesting here in the US, their houses would meet 3 ACH @ 50 pascals, and they are going to .2ACH soon.

    Just a thought!

  12. fdsfsgdr | Apr 05, 2011 11:08am | #12

    hello everyone,im wholesale supplier online

    Welcome to our website

    ===== http://www.goodshopping.us/ =======

    accept paypal or credit card and free shipping

    We need your support and trust!!!

    Dear friends, please temporarily stop your footsteps

    To our website Walk around A look at

    Maybe you'll find happiness in your sight shopping heaven and earth

    You'll find our price is more suitable for you.

    === http://www.goodshopping.us/ =====

  13. lightsourceon | Jan 07, 2013 12:32pm | #13

    A important article to read on Building Science Corp. RR-0903 High R Value Walls where 12 different test walls were studied.
    Of key importance is where does the dew point occur in a wall.
    Ponder that with sheathing faced double studs walls of extra thick insulation...

  14. 2imca | Apr 05, 2013 08:00pm | #14

    my home was constructed with double 2x4 exterior walls. both are insulated with fiberglass batts. the home convects like crazy. very difficult to heat and keep comfortible. in the summer the a/c load is minimal. this creates an issue of increased humidity, since the hvac only runs 10-12 minutes. i am not so convinced on this type of construction.
    i have started to disect the home to understand the construction technique. the windowa are between the two walls, they also cut out the subfloor around the perimeter between the double walls. does this make any sense to anyone?

  15. sawzall316 | Aug 16, 2014 11:59am | #15

    This type of building will likely stay in the fringe world of modern construction for certain rural areas where exterior space is not an issue. For urban buildings that kind of methodology of building means no usable floorspace in a home or unit. Building a double wall also means higher building costs and a higher price point for profitability...very few customers will be willing to pay that premium. And I must repeat what I mentioned before, property taxes are based on external dimensions of structures. How do you sell that having significantly less space will have one paying much more taxes per usable square footage?

  16. user-1149688 | Oct 27, 2014 02:33pm | #16

    Cost effective,sawzall, because the energy savings are real and immediate. I built with this type of construction in 1986 and have real experience. No humidity issues and my home uses about 1/2 the energy of a code-built home.

  17. user-1149688 | Oct 27, 2014 02:37pm | #17

    rocketdriver-

    How can adding 6" of wall thickness reduce the area by more than a few percent.
    Your 18" reachin for windows is even more absurd.

    Open your minds, builders, or your competition will smoke you - and you will deserve it!!!

  18. redrocket | May 24, 2015 12:39am | #18

    fdsfsgdr: Are you lost? No sales pitch, please.

  19. jeffs1979 | May 26, 2015 10:51am | #19

    Seems like a lot of extra work and money. I only have 2x4 exterior walls in my house and my gas bill averages about $100 a month. I think a 2x6 wall would provide plenty of insulation. Also when you make you exterior walls a foot thick you lose a lot of square footage. I think adjusting the trusses so more insulation can be added around the edges would be plenty to keep the house comfortable with a reasonable gas bill.

  20. jklingel | Feb 02, 2016 05:59pm | #20

    You need to consider the heating degree days in your area and run the numbers. It is neither rocket science nor opinion; it is simple arithmetic (to get pretty darn close. If you want to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for a computer-generated calculation, go for it; you may or may not pay for it in savings. It depends on your own prior knowledge, IMO.) Double-studding does take up more space: Ya think? So does a 3-car garage, a huge family room, etc. Most houses can be a tad smaller inside and be roomy enough; the trade-off is reduced heating/cooling bills and more general comfort. A REMOTE wall is more "condensed" than double-stud, but uses nasty foam for insulation (polyiso being the most Earth friendly). As for double-studding being convective and uncomfortable, that is poor execution, not the double-stud concept. Airtight construction everywhere is the key to comfort. Triple pane windows are generally not necessary unless you are in climate zones 7 and 8, maybe 6, IMO. Get the sizing and glazing right, and airtight double panes are pretty good, and cheaper. Again, run the numbers. BTW: Exceeding code is not saying much. Codes, recall, are minimum acceptable values. Two 2x4's are cheaper than one 2x6 (in my area) and the extra expense to build a second wall adds very little to the overall cost of a house; 10% is what I read. Too, you can sheath the interior 2x4 wall w/ plywood (taped and goo'd, it's an air barrier) and have a chase for pipes and wires, therefor minimizing penetrations into your air barrier. Same thing on the lid. Remember that a 1" square hole losses more air than 32 sf of sheetrock will diffuse; stop air movement! So, argue all you want about whether or not double-studding is "right", but run the numbers and shut up; then do it or don't. Depends. cheers. john

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

More Editor's Notepad

View All
  • 9 Tips for Building a Better Deck
  • The 2017 Builders' Show Preview
  • Checking out the 2016 National Hardware Show
  • Old Tools, Old Friends
View All

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Passive House Homestead on Protected Land

This Montana homestead is a study in environmental stewardship and sustainable building practices.

Featured Video

Builder’s Advocate: An Interview With Viewrail

Learn more about affordable, modern floating stairs, from design to manufacturing to installation.

Related Stories

  • Convert a Porch to a Mudroom
  • Exterior Materials for a Midcentury Home
  • Screened-Porch Cable-Rail Installation
  • Podcast 597: Members-only Aftershow — Mike’s Not-so-Forever Home

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Video

View All Videos
  • Exterior Materials for a Midcentury Home
  • Screened-Porch Cable-Rail Installation
  • Podcast 597: Members-only Aftershow — Mike’s Not-so-Forever Home
  • Replacing Old Shingles with a New Metal Roof
View All

Design and Planning

View All Design and Planning Articles
  • Meet Current Energy Codes with Continuous Insulation
  • Hand-Crafted Pendant Lights
  • Make Mudsills Square and Level
  • Durable and Sustainable Zinc Roofing and Cladding
View All Design and Planning Articles

BOOKS, DVDs, & MERCH

Shop the Store
  • Pretty Good House
    Buy Now
  • 2022 Fine Homebuilding Archive
    Buy Now
  • 2023 Tool Guide
    Buy Now
  • Code Check Complete 3rd Edition
    Buy Now
  • Shop the Store

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 318 - October 2023
    • Make Mudsills Square and Level
    • Turn Up the Heat With Induction Cooktops
    • The Fine Homebuilding Interview: Lloyd Alter
  • Issue 317 - Aug/Sept 2023
    • Finishing Drywall With Seamless Results
    • A Flat Roof in a Cold Climate
    • Compact Cordless Shop Vacs
  • Issue 316 - July 2023
    • Timber-Framed Solar Canopies
    • Build a Transom Above a Stock Door
    • Understanding Toilet Design and Efficiency
  • Issue 315 - June 2023
    • How to Craft a Copper Roof
    • 5 Lessons from Building in a Cold Climate
    • The Advantages of Cellular PVC Siding
  • Issue 314 - April/May 2023
    • 7 Options for Countertops
    • Tool Test: Wood-Boring Bits
    • Critical Details for Ductless Heat Pumps

Fine Homebuilding

Follow

  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok
  • twitter

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences

Taunton Network

  • Green Building Advisor
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Fine Gardening
  • Threads
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2023 The Taunton Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Shop the Store

  • Books
  • DVDs
  • Taunton Workshops

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok
  • twitter

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in