Hi everyone, does anyone know the results of fine woodworkings review of brad nailers they did in Feb. of this year. I am looking at the Senco FP25xp vs the porter cable bn800a. I tried the Senco FP18, but it wouldn’t sink the nails fully in pine moulding, could been a defective one, but I sent it back. The senco is like $40 bucks more, but if it is hands down worth it I’ll spring for it.
HDK
Replies
FWW said and I quote from page 77.."decent performer but difficult to clear nail jambs"
They reccommended Paslode T200-F18 costing approx $100 porter cable BN200A 2nd place. I use the Accuset BN125 and like it a lot but I think it is not available any more
clearing nail jambs?
multiple nail firings that jamb up in the gun....
oh sorry I meant nail jams! You know the tasty stuff you use on your trimmed bread!
Thanks for the info, are you saying that they didn't really care for the expensive Senco? If thats the case, thats good news, it will save me some money.
HDK
They didn't like it. Said the Senco requires 2 different hex screws to remove top to clear jams. But said at least the 2 hex screws are designed/attached to the tool.
Thanks Jagwah, I'll get the Porter cable.
HDK
Good luck
Edited 11/10/2004 1:51 pm ET by JAGWAH
Porte cable!!
Made in taiwan!
Go with a Hitachi!!
Hitachi has making nail guns down.
Senco and Paslode are the only ones that compete.
Mr T
I can't afford to be affordable anymore
just to throw some more mud in your mix<G> I've been using a senco slp 20 for 10 years, only problem has been a broken driver...after a helper tried nailing shoe to tile. All sencos are easy to fix and have available parts...that's a big plus.
Among other guns, I've got a PC 15g angled nailer, it's okay. Packs more wallop than my SFN40, so I use it it with 2 1/2" nails in hardwood. It is a bit cumbersome, and parts keep falling off...
The other pinner I've got, and like, is a Bostich. Can't remember the number, but it TAKES oil and shoots up to 18g 2" brads(I found the oiless, magnesium one useless)...it packs some serious azz...it works much better than a PC pinner I used.
Now, if you were talking about a 23g headless baby, Omer...d'oh<G> Don't worry, we can fix that later!
me too, I got my SLP20 in 93 and have had it in the shop one time. I sanded the bumper down to make it drive deeper.
Another vote for the Senco slp20, have had it for quit a while and no problemos.
Thanks for the insights. I guess I'm going to give the Porter Cable a shot, It is about $50.00 cheaper. And by the way, I live in Delaware, not ohio.
HDK
Thanks hdk, enjoyed your state while passing through it.Remodeling Contractor just outside the Glass City.
Quittin' Time
Duo FAst sells the Apach brand of brad nailer. I bought one 2 years ago and have been real happy with it. It does not jam (jamb) and it sinks the nail fine. Cost is about $100.00 and Duo FAst will repair it for free if it is not abused.
James Hart
I know an HDK, he's from cleveland. That you?
Either way, I've had the xp25 from senco for ?..........memory fades..........couple years. No nail jamb yet. Did have a problem recently, my local tool supplier (never online...never) took care of it as a warranty issue (ring or seal failed, causing it to blow air, lose power. The pump up the volume "power increase" is a nice feature, along with adjustible depth. Drives a long brad through/into oak well. I like it. And as has been said, local service makes a difference.
Remodeling Contractor just outside the Glass City.
Quittin' Time
Had the porter-cable for a couple weeks then got smart and got the hitachi like the rest of my guns are. No comparison, Hitachi rules with nailers.
See, now you go and make me second guess myself.<g> I hate myself for obsessing over a brad nailer, life is to damn short, I guess any of them would work for me. But, at least when it jams I can say I knew I should have bought the Hitachi, Senco, or Paslode.<G>.
HDK
The Makita is a sweet tool. I've used my brothers a lot, and like it more than my Senco. The built-in hook is great, and the nose is flat which makes it easy to place brads on convex surfaces.