I beleive most glulam beams used in structural roof ridge beams have deflection ratings of L/180. My question is, in a 20 foot of so beam you have a possible deflection of about 1.5 inches in the middle of the beam, at this level of deflection the rafters would push out by a similar amount (assuming a 12 in 12 pitch). How can this be acceptable? This amount of push out would make for unsightly walls at best. If the rafter ends rest in such a way that additional second story partitions are associated with these rafter tails you could have major sideways shifting. Am I missing something here?
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story
Learn the specific guidelines for location, spacing, and clearance for optimal safety.
Featured Video
Video: Build a Fireplace, Brick by BrickHighlights
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Replies
Anyone know anything about beams and deflection
Bump
See your similar post in that other thread.
thanks.
Apple or oranges?
Been trying to figure out if you guys are on the same page.
He was talking about gluelams and you gave him information on paralams. Diffrent beast, but I understand you questioning the l/180. I havent seen that used in any load calculations for many, many years. Most company's use L/360 to over engineer any beams today.
I looked at the calcs on a porch structural ridge from I did....
I saw a number that was a whole lot bigger than what you list. Where did you get that "believe most" number?
thanks.
L/180 vs L/360
Agreed, I saw teh 180 in reference to some off teh shelf beam. Don't recall where. Since that time I have seen 240 and 360. I am not sure what is standard and what is custom order.
lvl on the porch ridge............
here's some of the calcs on the paperwork for ridge beam-rafter span, wall to wall 14'-2x8 rafters-16oc.
13'-8" Long.
1-ply-1-3/4 x 11-1/4
Standard Load dead >105 PLF
Standard Load snow>210PLF
Deflection criteria-L/360 live, L/240 total
in the Allowable Stress Design:
TL Deflection-0.5312" Actual 0.6615" Allowable L/298 Capacity 6.61' Location Total Load D+S
LL Deflection-0.4410" Actual 0.4410" Allowable L/455 Capacity 6.61' Location Total Load S
Hope there's something in there that you can use, but this was local specific 2 yrs ago. Engineered by the LVL company, accepted by City inspection.
Your basic mathematical premise of deflection is wrong
A ridge beam of 20' long, supported on both ends will not have a L/180 deflection approaching 1.32 inches because the deflection will be based on one half of 20'. In this case the L/180 deflection of a 20' ridge beam is 0.66 inches
Deflection
Thanks McMark for clarifying the deflection issue. I was thinking deflection was like looking at a giant circle and the beam was like a small section of the circumfrance (spelling?) so that you would divide the lenght of your portion of the circumfrance (ie your beam lenght) by the 180 or 240 or 360. I am sure nobody can understand what I am saying.
Anyway, you are sure deflection is calculated on half the beam length? I can see that can make sense.
Thanks.