*
Anyone ever notice that the people who interpret “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for grievances.” to mean freedom to pry into private lives and express your self in any manner possible are the same people who interpret “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” to mean that firearms should be solely in the possession of the police and the military?
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story
Easy-to-make tools simplify the framing, while time-tested flashing techniques make it last a lifetime.
Featured Video
How to Install Cable Rail Around Wood-Post CornersHighlights
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Replies
*
Anyone ever notice that the people who interpret "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for grievances." to mean freedom to pry into private lives and express your self in any manner possible are the same people who interpret "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." to mean that firearms should be solely in the possession of the police and the military?