FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

Post and beams or long LVL joists

madmadscientist | Posted in General Discussion on April 17, 2007 02:48am

Hello All,

Met with my foundation guy today and the SE he uses.  In a portion of the ground floor we want to remove a bearing wall to free up some floor space for a shop.  Right now the bearing wall supports midspan 2by10’s at 16″oc that are 19′ long.  So now the 2by10’s have a span of ~9.5′.  This is the middle floor of a 3-story house.

I was thinking of lally columns and beams to open up the space reasonably. Becuase the foundation does this weird discontinous thing I was thinking seperate columns and beams for each section.  Not a completely clear floor but way better than 2by6 joists at 16″OC.

My contractor and the engineer agreed that the easiest-cheapest-most elegant solution would be to sister LVL joists to the existing joists and clear span the 19′ with no midspan support.  I like this idea because I get major open floor space for the metal shop.  My contractor thinks it will be a wash moneywise as we will need about 20 LVL’s (exact size to still be determined by the SE) but we won’t have to but in the midbearing foundation in this case-well it wouldn’t be a foundation but pads for the columns-plus the actual columns-posts.

Here’s a pic of the bottom floor plan.

View Image

 

I want to clear span the area from the fireplace chase forward thru bedroom 1 the bath and the part of the garage wall. Yea I know it says inches but those are feet.

Daniel Neuman

Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

Oakland CA 

Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer


Edited 4/16/2007 7:50 pm by madmadscientist

Reply

Replies

  1. Schelling | Apr 17, 2007 03:50am | #1

    I am sure that your SE will figure out all the structural needs but my concern would be the loads on the floor from above. If the walls you are removing are load bearing it might be best to use beams and posts or you're lvl's may have to be big and expensive.

    1. User avater
      madmadscientist | Apr 17, 2007 04:36am | #2

      Yea I don't doubht that the SE can get it figured out....I was just wondering about whether or not money and time wise people thought the big LVL solution was best.

      Daniel Neuman

      Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

      Oakland CA 

      Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

      1. BillBrennen | Apr 17, 2007 06:01am | #3

        Daniel,Can you raise the building's roof to compensate for the deep LVL's, or will the metal shop lose headroom? To keep from being bouncy, you will want 18+" joists, which is 9" of potential lost headroom. Smaller ones will hold the loads, but could be bouncy.The partition walls may help to damp out any bounce you experience with smaller LVL's.Bill

        1. User avater
          madmadscientist | Apr 17, 2007 09:08am | #6

          Hi Bill,

          This is the bottom floor of a 3 story house so no I don't think raising the rest of the place to compensate would work.  But we can dig down further to get the hoped for 8' finished height.

          Unless you mean that once the place is up on cribbing that they remove the lower perimeter wall completely put in the deeper joists and then rebuild the wall slightly shorter?

          Daniel Neuman

          Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

          Oakland CA 

          Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

          1. BillBrennen | Apr 17, 2007 09:39am | #7

            Sorry, I was thinking new construction. You can go deeper without going beneath the footings? Or is the place getting a new foundation...time to carefully reread your original post.If the LVL's will hold the loads and you can lower the floor in the shop basement, then it seems worth doing to avoid the dreaded posts. A few stout posts will carry more load than a $$$-load of LVL's over the long haul, so I'd do the posts if the shop layout would not be ruined by it.Bill

          2. User avater
            madmadscientist | Apr 18, 2007 12:28am | #8

            Sorry, I was thinking new construction. You can go deeper without going beneath the footings? Or is the place getting a new foundation...time to carefully reread your original post.If the LVL's will hold the loads and you can lower the floor in the shop basement, then it seems worth doing to avoid the dreaded posts. A few stout posts will carry more load than a $$$-load of LVL's over the long haul, so I'd do the posts if the shop layout would not be ruined by it.

            Yep whole new foundation and slab for the entire house.  My initial inclination is the same that the 4 posts plus the two beams would carry the load easier and cheaper but my contractor and the engineer were of the opposite opinion.  The contractor I'm using is a good guy and he will do which ever way pencils out the most sane.

             

             

             

            Daniel Neuman

            Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

            Oakland CA 

            Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

          3. User avater
            madmadscientist | Apr 18, 2007 04:12am | #9

            I've looked a bit online but can not find a span table or span calculator for engineered wood.  If someone could point me to one I would greatly appreciate it.

            Daniel Neuman

            Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

            Oakland CA 

            Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

          4. woodguy99 | Apr 18, 2007 04:28am | #10

            http://www.ilevel.com/literature/TJ-9000.pdf 

             

          5. User avater
            madmadscientist | Apr 20, 2007 08:25am | #11

            Hi and thanks for that post.  I've read the section on floor joists and it looks like it says that the 9 1/2" deep by 13/4" wide 1.9E LVL will span the 20'.  Though I am not sure that I am reading that right.  I think it says that that is for L/360 which for a 20' run would be .66" which does not sound like what I would consider a strong floor.

            The specs from the table are total load of 54 plf, a live load for L/360 of 42plf. That doesn't sound super strong-stiff to me (if I am understanding the table) It looks like I would have to go up in depth tp 11 1/4" which would give me a total load of 100 plf and a live load for l/360 of 70 plf.  Alt I could go up in thickness of the beam to 3 1/2   by 9 1/2 for a total load of 119 plf and a L/360 of 85 plf. 

            But wow sistering up 20 3 1/2 by 9 1/2 beams sound like it might be a bit pricy...

            Daniel Neuman

            Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

            Oakland CA 

            Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

            Edited 4/20/2007 1:41 am by madmadscientist

          6. woodguy99 | Apr 20, 2007 01:41pm | #12

            Daniel, ignore the L/360.  You want the section with L/480.  I haven't read all of the page I linked to but I assume it's there.

            Also, if you haven't yet, you might want to check out Boss Hog's thread on vibration in floors.  The gist of it is, the higher you make your joists, the less vibration you'll have, and that vibration is independent of deflection.  IIRC.

            The house I am building has I-joists 14" x 3 1/2" at 16" o.c., spanning 20' and 22'.  Deflection is minimal, but there is some vibration.  Maybe once the finish floors go down it will be eliminated. 

             

          7. woodguy99 | Apr 20, 2007 01:54pm | #13

            I just checked the pdf doc--you're right in how you read the table.  42lbs live load is enough (40lbs is standard for living space) but it is for L/360 deflection, which means that over 20' it will eventually sag/bounce 5/8".  Not terrible but not great either. 

            For deflection of L/480 you multiply the live load value by .75, which gives you an allowable live load of 31.5 which is barely enough for bedrooms and not acceptable for living space. 

            If you sistered both sides of your joists with LVL's you could use the 3 1/2" table which gives you an allowable live load of around 80 lbs, adjusted to 60 lbs for L/480 deflection.  That is what you would want.  That's a lot of wood! 

             

          8. User avater
            madmadscientist | Apr 20, 2007 11:32pm | #14

            By my reading if I used a single 3.5 by 9.5" 1.9E LVL beam I would get a L/480 of 63.75 plf  add that to the existing beam strength and that seems like it would be a pretty strong -stiff floor.

            That said, sistering up ~20 3.5 by 9.5" LVL's seems like the hard way round for me.  The posts-beams wouldn't give a clear span but it does seem like it would be the cheapest-easiest way to go.  This seems to confirm my original gut feeling that the clear spanning with the LVL's is possible but probably not the most money-time efficent way to go.

            Daniel Neuman

            Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

            Oakland CA 

            Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

          9. joeh | Apr 21, 2007 02:59am | #15

            Daniel, you say this is the last house you do, those posts are going to be there forever.

            On the other hand, I had a shop with 2 posts. They were covered with extension cords, air lines & outlets.

            Fire extinguishers too, handy central location for everything.

            But still in the way.

            Joe H

          10. VaTom | Apr 23, 2007 12:53am | #17

            It looks like I would have to go up in depth tp 11 1/4" which would give me a total load of 100 plf and a live load for l/360 of 70 plf.

            A 10K1 bar joist at 20' carries 199plf total, 97plf live (1/360).  10" tall, 100lbs ea.

            12K1 at 20' is 241plf total, 142plf live, 100 lbs ea.

            Spans are better than posts.PAHS Designer/Builder- Bury it!

  2. Framer | Apr 17, 2007 06:58am | #4

    Would this be a 19' clear span with no walls above on the third floor?

    Joe Carola
    1. User avater
      madmadscientist | Apr 17, 2007 09:05am | #5

      Hi Joe,

      I'm sure I'm not being clear.  The pic above is for the bottom floor of the house which is slab slightly below grade.  Then the 2by10's we are talking  about form the floor for the second floor of the house.  Above that there is a third, lets call it, 3/4 floor which is a finished attic.

      These 2by10's now only span 9'ish because of the center bearing wall.  The engineer thinks we can span the entire 19' holding up two floors by sistering lvl joists onto the existing 2by10's....that's what I'm curious about...

      Daniel Neuman

      Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

      Oakland CA 

      Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

  3. woodguy99 | Apr 21, 2007 01:50pm | #16

    Daniel, I'm still a little confused by your drawing/description.  What you've shown is the first floor, correct?  (American meaning of first floor, or main level, usually just above grade.)  With another story and a half above that?  And the area for your metal shop is the basement?  Sorry I'm just a little confused. 

    How is the headroom in the basement now?  You could support the center of the joists with a steel beam (26.87' long).  Might be 12" to 16" high though.

     

     

    1. User avater
      madmadscientist | Apr 25, 2007 02:41am | #18

      Sorry I am probably using some terms interchangably and screwing things up.

      The level shown is the first floor which is a foot below grade.  I should not be calling it a basement but in CA people get a little sloppy with that term.  The shop area is on the first floor in the diagram above it would take over the areas listed as, living room, bathroom, and bedroom #1.  Then yes there is a full floor and a half above the level shown.

      Daniel Neuman

      Restoring our second Victorian home this time in Alamdea CA.  Check out the blog http://www.chezneumansky.blogspot.com/ 

      Oakland CA 

      Crazy Homeowner-Victorian Restorer

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Solar Shingles in Austin

A Tesla roof powers this five-bedroom Texas home and then transfers extra energy to the power grid.

Featured Video

How to Install Cable Rail Around Wood-Post Corners

Use these tips to keep cables tight and straight for a professional-looking deck-railing job.

Related Stories

  • Podcast 549: Energy Upgrades, Chimney Inspections, and Questions About a Home You Might Buy
  • Podcast 549: Members-only Aftershow—Patios vs. Decks
  • Podcast 548: PRO TALK With Design/Build Operations Manager Jessica Bishop-Smyser
  • Strategies for Venting a Roof Valley

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

BOOKS, DVDs, & MERCH

Shop the Store
  • 2023 Tool Guide
    Buy Now
  • Code Check Building 4th Edition
    Buy Now
  • 2022 Fine Homebuilding Archive
    Buy Now
  • Pretty Good House
    Buy Now
  • Shop the Store

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 314 - April/May 2023
    • 7 Options for Countertops
    • Tool Test: Wood-Boring Bits
    • Critical Details for Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 313 - Feb/March 2023
    • Practical System for a Seismic Retrofit
    • Fine Homebuilding Issue #313 Online Highlights
    • Practical System for a Seismic Retrofit
  • Issue 312 - Dec 2022/Jan 2023
    • Tool Test: Cordless Tablesaws
    • Gray-Water System for a Sustainable Home
    • Insulate a Cape Roof to Avoid Ice Dams
  • Issue 311 - November 2022
    • 7 Steps to a Perfect Exterior Paint Job
    • Options for Smarter Home-Energy Tracking
    • The Fine Homebuilding Interview: James Metoyer
  • Issue 310 - October 2022
    • Choosing a Tile-Leveling System
    • Choosing Between HRVs and ERVs
    • Custom Built-in Cabinets Made Easy

Fine Homebuilding

Follow

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • pinterest

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences

Taunton Network

  • Green Building Advisor
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Fine Gardening
  • Threads
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2023 The Taunton Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Shop the Store

  • Books
  • DVDs
  • Taunton Workshops

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • pinterest

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in