Houses far smaller than the norm are being marketed for their energy efficiency and their small environmental footprints, and now in Dallas a collaboration of public and private interests hopes really small houses will give at least some of the city’s troubled citizens a way out of chronic homelessness.
The Cottages at Hickory Crossing is a $6.8 million project that includes 50 self-contained houses, each with a footprint of 420 sq. ft., a central building with laundry and other shared facilities, and common outdoor areas on a 3.5-acre parcel near downtown Dallas.
A number of public agencies representing housing, social services and the criminal justice system all are partners. Cottages are intended specifically for people who are chronically homeless, those who suffer from severe and persistent mental illness, and those who have a history of substance abuse and entanglements with the criminal justice system. In other words, people who have a very tough time finding a place to live.
“It’s a trilogy in a way, like a Homer’s Odyssey, like great projects often are,” said Brent Brown, director of the bcWorkshop, the project architect. “It would be unfair if I didn’t say the project almost didn’t happen probably 10 times or more because it was hard. Partnerships are hard. Funding is hard. Building anything can be difficult.”
But by early next year, Brown said by telephone, construction should be complete and residents should be moving in.
Houses are small, but complete
Each of the 50 cottages has a full bathroom, a main room with a kitchen, a sleeping area, a storage area, and a porch. Each has 325 sq. ft. of interior conditioned space, Brown said, enough to give residents a private space. “Each resident has a door of their own,” Brown said, “and their own house identity.”
Cottages are grouped in clusters of six around a common green area. The site is big enough to have the potential for community gardens. The commons building will be open to the public. Residents will sign a no-cost lease and will have access to a variety of services on site.
Brown estimated each cottage costs between $25,000 and $30,000, with site development, studies and other costs making up the balance of the project cost.
Each wood-framed cottage is built on four concrete piers, rather than a concrete slab, partly because the clay-heavy soils on the site made conventional construction difficult, and partly because this approach will allow the cottages to be moved to a new home in the future and the site used for another purpose.
Brown said planners at bcWorkshop looked at a number of models in designing the site, including early New England settlements. For example, they found a Methodist community on Martha’s Vineyard built in a pattern of circles surrounding a common green. But where these communities attached social standing based on the circle where the house was built–higher status for those living closer to the common green–Dallas planners looked for an arrangement were “everyone had an equal level of stature,” Brown said.
Buildings at the project were designed with help from the community it will serve, Brown said, and “street experts” helped planners understand the difficulty of moving from life on the street to housing units. “There needs to be a way to retreat,” he said, “but also a way to engage on your own terms, as well as being able to be all together.”
Stable housing as a first step
The Cottages project is built on the “Housing First” model, which considers housing a first priority to be followed by whatever social services might be needed after that.
Given the common difficulties in the backgrounds of potential residents, planners assume a number of social service agencies will be needed. Even so, savings should be significant. According to an article in The Dallas Morning News, each person eligible for the project now costs the city $40,000 a year in services. But with a permanent home and a support system, that number drops to $15,000.
Brown said an annual survey in Dallas in 2014 counted 3314 homeless persons, 413 of whom were considered chronically homeless. So a project the size of The Cottages is a beginning.
“We need seven more projects like this,” he said.
Similar approaches have been proposed elsewhere. Last year, a New Jersey state senator suggested a $5 million “Tiny Home Pilot Program” in which clusters of 300-sq.-ft. houses would be built for the state’s poor. Earlier, a project called Quixote Village near Olympia, Washington, replaced a tent village for the homeless with 30 dwellings of 144 sq. ft. each.
Read more: http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/green-building-news%2A#ixzz3lA8I8trT
Follow us: @gbadvisor on Twitter | GreenBuildingAdvisor on Facebook
Fine Homebuilding Recommended Products
Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.
Reliable Crimp Connectors
Affordable IR Camera
Handy Heat Gun
This rendering shows a cluster of houses in a Dallas project that will benefit the chronically homeless. Each building includes a kitchen and sleeping area, a bathroom and a porch.
View Comments
Gee, this article had me feeling all warm and fuzzy .... until I looked at the numbers.
Ahem.
$6.8 Million? 50 units? 325 Square feet?
Unless I made a goof, that breaks down to $136,000 for each unit, at a cost of $323 per square foot.
I can't speak for the Dallas neighborhood where Dallas' homeless drift about ... but in most places $136K will buy you one heck of a decent 'real' home.
Likewise, most General Contractors can only dream about building for over $300 per square foot.
How about an alternative solution?
I'll bet that, for the same money, you could really make a dent in Dallas' supply of vacant / abandoned / foreclosed properties. I also bet you'd wind up with many more units than the paltry 50 for this project. Best part? These properties are already owned by the government!
Or, we could address this problem in a more traditional American way .... let a man make his own hovel on his own land. Homeless 'camps' showcase the talents these folks have for solving their problems ... how about we just get out of their way?
Of course, neither of my suggestions would enrich the army of architects, urban planners, social workers, and other parasites that keep the homeless from ever breaking free of 'the system.'