FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

16 vs 24 o.c.

twofingers | Posted in Construction Techniques on December 14, 2006 03:43am

Hey all…

I’m doing a basement remodel. I’ve never framed greater than 16″ o.c. but HO asked about 24″ o.c. to save some money.

The walls are not structural so I couldn’t really give any reasons why I should stick to 16″ o.c.

opinions? pros n cons?

thankya

Reply

Replies

  1. User avater
    Gene_Davis | Dec 14, 2006 04:12pm | #1

    Get everything straight and true, and you'll be fine.

    But, my goodness, what is being saved in cost by doing so?  Where else are you paring out cost?

  2. jet | Dec 14, 2006 04:21pm | #2

    The last time I did a basement. It was previously 24 O.C. with 2x3's. and no blocking in between.
    Had to put tile over top for the bathroom. SOOOOO much flex in the wall that I had to reframe the wall in 2x4's 16 O.C.

    So the question to ask is....what future plans does the H.O. have????

    "No doubt exists that all women are crazy; it's only a question of degree." - W.C. Fields
  3. woody1777 | Dec 14, 2006 04:23pm | #3

    Studs are around 2.50 here. Unless it is a leviathan of a basement, It cant be that much of a cost difference, IMHO.

    However, 24 o.c does get you more insulation in the wall = warmer walls. Maybe enough to notice, maybe not.

     

     

     

     

     

    A human being should be able to change a diaper,  plan an invasion,  butcher a hog,  conn a ship,  design a building, write a sonnet,  balance accounts,  build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specializtion is for insects. - robert heinlen    
    1. highfigh | Dec 14, 2006 07:04pm | #4

      He didn't say where he is and that will make a big difference in what amount of insulation is needed. Also, there will probably be some kind of break in the wall's envelope somewhere and any benefit of the extra insulation. Heavy wall coverings and need for acoustical treatment for isolation make stiffness necessary and 2x4-24" O.C. won't do it. Besides, as you said, unless it's a leviathon, the cost difference isn't that great. At $2.50/stud, 300' lineal ft of wall will need about 75 extra studs and cost about $186.5 plus the labor, which shouldn't be too bad if the framer is efficient. If it's in a really cold area, I would rather use 2x6-24" O.C..
      "I cut this piece four times and it's still too short."

  4. scruff | Dec 14, 2006 07:24pm | #5

    I just insulated the outside basement walls on a job of mine. Rather than framing walls, I used the Cel-Lock system by Owens-Corning. It's a 2" thick extruded polystyrene with shiplapped edges and grooves in it to accept a metal furring channel that tapcons to the foundation wall. We just drywalled over that. Rather than taking a couple of days to frame and insulate around all the windows, ducts and other stuff, it took one day and it went great. Granted, the basement walls were straight and plumb. If your walls are otherwise, it might be a pain.
    I would recommend 16" centres if you're framing however. I like to use metal framing track on the floors & ceilings and use wood studs. That way I don't have to cut studs exactly to length or shim the walls tight. If using metal studs, I find that they are only rigid enough if they are drywalled both sides. For outside walls they should have the horizontal rails slid in and snapped into position.

  5. User avater
    JDRHI | Dec 14, 2006 07:28pm | #6

    Depends highly on the planned finished surfaces.

    Drywall oughtta be at least 5/8" for 24" centers.....as mentioned, a tiled wall will flex an awful lot. I have gotten away with 24s when install T-111.

    Happy

    Holidays 

  6. woodguy99 | Dec 15, 2006 05:27am | #7

    I prefer 22oz myself, but sometimes half to settle for 16oz....

    And for framing, stick with 16o.c. if you want fine homebuilding.  24" o.c. is for hacks who don't mind wavy walls.

    1. User avater
      Gene_Davis | Dec 15, 2006 06:00am | #8

      This hack framed at 24 today.  Mea culpa.  We can build straight ones all day at 24 centers, and wavy ones using 16s or even the black diamonds.  I'll bet you can, too.  IMHO, straight ain't a function of the stud spacing.

      Think about it when considering the diff between AM radio and FM.  Amplitude and frequency.  Amplitude goes up when your lumber sucks, and doubles when your partner can't read the crowns right.  If you consider frequency, you might conclude that the straightest wall might be done with no studs at all!

      But we're just building rustic shacks up in these here Adirondacks.  Fine homebuilding must be something happening from Lake Champlain east. ;-)

      If you think 16's straighter, why don't you go to 12 and get'm all like pool tables?

      Edited 12/14/2006 10:06 pm ET by Gene_Davis

      1. rez | Dec 15, 2006 08:16am | #9

        dang that was a funny post. Roar!

         

         damn, am I fat!

      2. User avater
        JDRHI | Dec 15, 2006 04:53pm | #11

        LOL.

        Happy

        Holidays 

      3. dovetail97128 | Dec 15, 2006 06:16pm | #12

        That would explain why here in Ore. all the walls no matter what spacing seem wavy.. the further away the greater the peaks and valleys of the amplitude. ;-)

      4. twofingers | Dec 15, 2006 06:44pm | #13

        The Adirondacks?Well, heck - I've done a few things up in them there parts myself.

        1. User avater
          Gene_Davis | Dec 16, 2006 12:24am | #14

          We certainly couldn't tell by your profile.

          Local code requires we frame exterior walls using 2x6s, but nobody is specifying any maximum spacing.

          1. twofingers | Dec 16, 2006 01:40am | #19

            --
            "We certainly couldn't tell by your profile."
            --Well, ya know - a few years back I had a profile and a different user-name and all that.But I come back from the wilds of Montana to find my information is no longer here. In addition to that, I can't even seem to figure out <i>where</i> I would input any profile information.As far as the 24" vs 16" - I decided to go with 16" just like always.

      5. woodguy99 | Dec 16, 2006 12:43am | #15

        This hack framed at 24 today.  Mea culpa.

        That's ok Gene. 

        But we're just building rustic shacks up in these here Adirondacks.  Fine homebuilding must be something happening from Lake Champlain east. ;-)

        If you say so.  I'm just building cottages on the Maine coast.

        If you think 16's straighter, why don't you go to 12 and get'm all like pool tables?

        Why waste the lumber?   We get'm like pool tables at 16.  Sometimes we do floors at 12 but it makes it harder for us and the other trades.

        Do you use 1/2" rock on 24" centers?  I could see it with 5/8" rock or with wood walls, but not 1/2" rock.

        Do you install clapboards, nailing to the studs?  Do you find it works ok at 24" centers?  I would think that would be too far apart for good nailing.  Do you put your clapboard joints over studs?  Fewer studs means more waste of clear vertical grain red cedar, at least that's what we use for clapboards.

        What are your reasons for 24" o.c.?  I'm all for energy efficiency, I use California corners and rigid foam in my wall pockets, but I think the 24"o.c. thing solves one problem but creates many more.

         

        Mike Maines

      6. woodguy99 | Dec 16, 2006 10:59pm | #21

        Gene, you still haven't answered my question of why you framed at 24" o.c., which after re-reading the beginning of this thread I noticed you started out arguing for 16" o.c.

        1. User avater
          Gene_Davis | Dec 17, 2006 12:08am | #22

          Framing at 24 is done to save lumber, and at exterior walls, to decrease the thermal transfer done by studs, thus increasing the wall assembly's overall R-value.

    2. User avater
      JDRHI | Dec 15, 2006 04:51pm | #10

      Actually, wavy walls has more to do with the person installing the studs than it has to do with how many he installs.

      Happy

      Holidays 

      1. woodguy99 | Dec 16, 2006 12:46am | #16

        Actually, wavy walls has more to do with the person installing the studs than it has to do with how many he installs.

        Crowning studs is carpentry 101.  At 24" o.c. you will see deflection between studs in the sheetrock and on the exterior.

        1. User avater
          JDRHI | Dec 16, 2006 01:30am | #17

          The original rafters on my own home...circa 1906....are almost 30" on center.

          When I bought the house, and tore off the 4 layers of shingles, all I had to do was put down a layer of plywood decking. One of the flattest roofs in the neighborhood.

          Happy

          Holidays 

          1. woodguy99 | Dec 16, 2006 01:36am | #18

            That's cool. 

            Rough-sawn 1x decking?

            House I grew up in was built in 1817.  Rafters were roughly 4' o.c., and still had bark on the bottom side.  Rough 1x decking that bowed like crazy between rafters.

            Maybe that's why I "overbuild" at 16" centers now. 

          2. User avater
            JDRHI | Dec 16, 2006 02:07am | #20

            Nope....no decking at all....original roof was wood shake on batten strips.

            (Full) 2 x 6 rafters....NO RIDGE! I left the battens for fear they were the only thing holding the rafters in place. 1" T & G plywood decking.....pain in the arse with the random spacing of the rafters.

            I don't consider 16" centers overbuilding at all....just not always necessary depending on what is being applied to interior and exterior.

            Happy

            Holidays 

  7. sotabuilder | Dec 17, 2006 02:40am | #23

    One other benefit to 24" OC is now your bearing can be transfered from your 24" OC trusses right down to the footing even though in this situation you are not bearing. i believe the theory is you also get about 40 % less thermal transfer going 24" OC than 16" OC. another advantage is your sheetrock is easy 8 footers break on studs and 4 footers break on studs but of course you need 5/8" on 24 centers. easier for homeowner to rock himself.

    what do i know though im just a dumb carpenter

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Behind the Scenes of a Concrete Batch Plant

The batch plant is your partner in getting high-quality concrete on your job site.

Featured Video

Builder’s Advocate: An Interview With Viewrail

Learn more about affordable, modern floating stairs, from design to manufacturing to installation.

Related Stories

  • Podcast 548: PRO TALK With Design/Build Operations Manager Jessica Bishop-Smyser
  • Strategies for Venting a Roof Valley
  • Podcast 547: Basement Insulation, Historic Preservation Resources, and Shipping Container ADUs
  • Podcast 547: Members-only Aftershow—Fine Homebuilding House memories

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

BOOKS, DVDs, & MERCH

Shop the Store
  • Pretty Good House
    Buy Now
  • 2022 Fine Homebuilding Archive
    Buy Now
  • 2023 Tool Guide
    Buy Now
  • Code Check Building 4th Edition
    Buy Now
  • Shop the Store

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 314 - April/May 2023
    • 7 Options for Countertops
    • Tool Test: Wood-Boring Bits
    • Critical Details for Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 313 - Feb/March 2023
    • Practical System for a Seismic Retrofit
    • Fine Homebuilding Issue #313 Online Highlights
    • Practical System for a Seismic Retrofit
  • Issue 312 - Dec 2022/Jan 2023
    • Tool Test: Cordless Tablesaws
    • Gray-Water System for a Sustainable Home
    • Insulate a Cape Roof to Avoid Ice Dams
  • Issue 311 - November 2022
    • 7 Steps to a Perfect Exterior Paint Job
    • Options for Smarter Home-Energy Tracking
    • The Fine Homebuilding Interview: James Metoyer
  • Issue 310 - October 2022
    • Choosing a Tile-Leveling System
    • Choosing Between HRVs and ERVs
    • Custom Built-in Cabinets Made Easy

Fine Homebuilding

Follow

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • pinterest

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences

Taunton Network

  • Green Building Advisor
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Fine Gardening
  • Threads
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2023 The Taunton Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Shop the Store

  • Books
  • DVDs
  • Taunton Workshops

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • pinterest

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in