In the attached diagram:
The notched posts A and B, is the A scenario “stronger” than B?
Is the “strength” added at point c?
or ………….?
—————————————————————————–
WWPD
In the attached diagram:
The notched posts A and B, is the A scenario “stronger” than B?
Is the “strength” added at point c?
or ………….?
—————————————————————————–
WWPD
Skim-coating with joint compound covers texture, renews old drywall and plaster, and leaves smooth surfaces ready to paint.
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox
Fine Homebuilding
Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox
© 2024 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.
Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.
Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox
Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.
Start Your Free TrialStart your subscription today and save up to 70%
SubscribeGet complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.
Already a member? Log in
Replies
What diagram?
View Image-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WWPD
In all seriousness.....the secondary joist in "A" is actually snug to the post, yes?
FREE SPONGE BOB,SANCHO PANTS!
Yes snug
The post (4x4) HAS to be notched.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WWPD
Edited 11/13/2006 10:43 pm ET by Sailfish
Definitely a, I dont know why it did not come in your first post it still do'nt came up in the next one though
If you would remove the notch the post would be at least twice as strong!
Edited 11/13/2006 10:33 pm ET by T White
I don't see either option as much stronger than the other. I think both posts would be equally likely to sheer off, or bend and break at the skinny part near the top of the notch. The only advantage I can see is having the additional material near the other side of the post is it may help the bolts not pull through the post as easily.
Then again, if you were to use big enough washers that would be unlikely anyway. In all actuallity, the extra wood would mean extra shrinking and I think over time the post would be more likely to loosen up.
I guess I vote B for simplicity sake.
Wait, are we talking about deck posts for railings here? I guess form the detail I just assumed.
You need to click on the attachment.
FREE SPONGE BOB,SANCHO PANTS!
Yes..."A" is definetly stronger than "B".
I doubt any real strength is added at "C" though.
FREE SPONGE BOB,SANCHO PANTS!
What kind of strength?????
Load bearing of the joist/beam or whatever that is, or lateral strength of the post????
Or does point C mean compressive strength?
Say more about the situation. What R U trying to figure out?
Welcome to the
Taunton University of Knowledge FHB Campus at Breaktime.
where ...
Excellence is its own reward!
The lateral strength of the post.
Is it stronger in a or b? Why?
It is for porch/deck railing posts.
Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WWPD
Edited 11/13/2006 10:58 pm ET by Sailfish
Edited 11/13/2006 11:05 pm ET by Sailfish
I don't think A was done for strength, I think it was done for wear. The added block may be acting as a washer, it can crack or get crushed some without affecting the integrity of the post. It may also be acting as a spacer if the bought all the bolts too long not realizing they were going to notch them.Rebuilding my home in Cypress, CA
Also a CRX fanatic!
No diff whatsoever in lateral strength
Welcome to the Taunton University of Knowledge FHB Campus at Breaktime. where ... Excellence is its own reward!
<No diff whatsoever in lateral strength>
I agree. Also, as someone else said, there may be an increase in B stiffness because two joists are loaded in torsion.
But, that might make the post in B slightly MORE likely to fail under a sharp lateral blow because the base is less resilient and lass able to absorb the shock.
Forrest
Yep; just described the situation to DW as I took her her wake-up coffee in bed.
She laughed and said it would make the snapped-off post crisper across the break!
Forrest - you know that prank where you get on your hands and knees behind someone and your friend pushes them over you? Like that.
Thanks all.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WWPD
Another question would be is the added material shown in option "A" just blocking or is it another full length joist. If it were a full length joist, then the entire assembly may feel a little stiffer because you would be putting both of the joists in torsion instead of just one.
However, the post itself IMO is going to actually have the same bending or breaking characteristics in either condition.
If it's just blocking, I still say B, with the proper washers
Edited 11/13/2006 11:19 pm ET by xosder11