Replies

1. 
   shelternerd | Apr 22, 2009 08:17am | #1

   I like #2 the best by far.

   m

   ------------------

   "You cannot work hard enough to make up for a sloppy estimate."

2. 
   Ted W. | Apr 22, 2009 09:10am | #2

   #2 because the joists can be fastened together. That way you have a true double joist, as opposed to 2 single joists.

   Rabbeting the 6x6 shouldn't be any problem, but let's hear what others have to say on that matter.

   ~ Ted W ~

   Cheap Tools! - MyToolbox.net
   Meet me at House & Builder!

3. 
   BillBrennen | Apr 22, 2009 09:22am | #3

   I also like #2 the best. The notch weakens the 6x6, but it is at the end, not subjected to much bending, so what is the big deal about it? The joists are solidly supported and can be tied together and the 3x6 alongside them prevents rolling over.

   So long as you use treated posts, burying them in the earth is stronger because it helps prevent racking, like a pole barn does. If they sit on top of concrete in the air, ALL the racking forces have to be resisted by diagonals or shearwalls.

   Bill

4. 
   Piffin | Apr 22, 2009 01:44pm | #4

   #2 without a doubt

    

    

   Welcome to the
   Taunton University of Knowledge FHB Campus at Breaktime.
    where ...
   Excellence is its own reward!

5. 
   BossHog | Apr 22, 2009 02:06pm | #5

   I'd also suggest #2. But #1 would likely be OK also.

   No way would I accept #3 or #4.

   The trouble with the legal profession is that 98 percent of its members give the rest a bad name.

1. 
   Piffin | Apr 22, 2009 02:09pm | #6

   For #1 I'd use scrap deadwood for blocking to maintain a connection between the two. overall a lot more work to do that one, but can be more aesthetically pleasing in some situations. 

    

   Welcome to the Taunton University of Knowledge FHB Campus at Breaktime. where ... Excellence is its own reward!

6. 
   MikeHennessy | Apr 22, 2009 02:26pm | #7

   Hmm. Everybody likes #2, but if it's exposed to the elements, those two boards will trap water between 'em, leading to premature rot. If you go with #2, some 1/4" spacers between 'em will let 'em drain.

   Mike Hennessy
   Pittsburgh, PA

1. 
   Piffin | Apr 22, 2009 02:32pm | #8

   On a deck, I'd use vycor over them, but this is up under a roof where only rare wind suction will leave a few drips on that joint. 

    

   Welcome to the Taunton University of Knowledge FHB Campus at Breaktime. where ... Excellence is its own reward!

7. 
   Henley | Apr 22, 2009 02:59pm | #9

   Poor old number 4 never had a chance.

1. 
   Ted W. | Apr 22, 2009 05:16pm | #15

   Poor old number 4 never had a chance.

   #4 is just #1 without the toung in the middle, which is needed to stiffen it.

   I would have voted for #4 if the rafters were moved together, get rid of the simpson ties, notch the post on one side and set them down in it, and through bolted with the 1/2" carriage bolts left over from not doing #2.

   ~ Ted W ~

   Cheap Tools! - MyToolbox.netMeet me at House & Builder!

   Edited 4/22/2009 10:16 am by Ted W.

8. 
   Boats234 | Apr 22, 2009 04:01pm | #10

   And the answer is??? A resounding #2

   If you need some engineering back up, go to link and view fact sheet #13

   http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema499.shtm

   I'd boom up to some 8x8's and use rough cut 3x12's for girders. Compare the price and see what ya think.

9. 
   KylefromKy | Apr 22, 2009 04:11pm | #11

   Thanks much for all the quick and mostly unanimous responses. #2 it will be!

   I agree with BillBrennan regarding the strength of burying the posts in the ground, but I'm curious how long they will last compared to being above ground on concrete. (I neglected to mention the possibility that one day the RV might be hauled away and the structure could be closed in and converted to a shop or storage shed.) If I do bury them, how deep and is there any need for concrete around them?

   Piffin is right about the headers - they will be under the roof and mostly out of the weather, but that brings up another question: Is there any need for the roof framing (headers, collar ties and rafters) to be made from pressure treated lumber, or would it be safe to use non-treated?

   Thanks again for the all the opinions. It's very encouraging.
   "Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours."

   p.s. Thank you all for being kind enough not to comment on my misspelling of the word "rabbet". I guess it's still too close to Easter!

   Edited 4/22/2009 9:33 am ET by KylefromKy

   
   

   ---

   Edited 4/22/2009 9:50 am ET by KylefromKy

1. 
   dovetail97128 | Apr 22, 2009 04:45pm | #12

   Might check this site out. Pick a plan and you can see construction details.

   http://www.public.iastate.edu/~mwps_dis/mwps_web/hy_plans.html#Anchor73110 here is the main page
   http://www.ebackroad.com/0mwpsorg-freefarmplans.html

   Edited 4/22/2009 9:46 am by dovetail97128

2. 
   JeffBuck | Apr 22, 2009 04:50pm | #13

   concrete around the post helps hold moisture and speeds up the rot.

   pack it tight with tamped gravel.

   Jeff

        Buck Construction

    Artistry In Carpentry

        Pittsburgh Pa

3. 
   Tomrocks21212 | Apr 22, 2009 05:23pm | #16

   # 2 without a doubt. I built this structure in 1988, took the pic a couple of years ago. I wouldn't worry about longevity if you put it together right.

   
1. 
   KylefromKy | Apr 22, 2009 05:51pm | #17

   Hi Tom,
   Nice joinery for an outbuilding! It looks like you used pressure treated for the headers and rafters, is that right? Did you bury the posts, and if so, how?
   "Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours."

   Edited 4/22/2009 11:27 am ET by KylefromKy

1. 
   Tomrocks21212 | Apr 22, 2009 09:11pm | #19

   It's all PT. The footings were poured to ground level, and shot with a transit. Steel post bases were bolted in place, and all pieces were cut about 3/4 of a mile away and hauled up the hill on a farm wagon, and assembled there. I only needed the generator to drill bolt holes for the lumber connections. Everything else was pre-cut to length.It's at my buddy's rifle range, so whenever I go there to shoot, I take a couple of wrenches to make sure the connections are still tight.The plywood scabs you see he installed so he could have blown-in cellulose installed, sprayed up against the fiberglass (for sound absorption). After about a year, environmental conditions, plus a lot of muzzle blast, removed about 90% of the cellulose.

1. 
   KylefromKy | Apr 23, 2009 01:46am | #21

   Thanks, Tom.
   That does sound like a long lasting type of construction.I'm wavering between the relative ease of burying the PT posts vs. instinctively mounting them above ground on concrete, which seems destined to last longer. I live on a farm that's littered with decaying pole buildings, (from the 1950's and 60's, granted they're not PT) whose posts are rotted at the base and shortened by 6-12" causing the rooflines to sag and the rest of the framing to bend and break. (Sounds kind of like me come to think of it). After seeing the degradation, I'd like to make sure the buildings I construct have the best chance possible.(oh, you said wrenches, not wenches.)"Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours."Edited 4/22/2009 6:51 pm ET by KylefromKy

   Edited 4/22/2009 7:19 pm ET by KylefromKy

4. 
   EricPaulson | Apr 22, 2009 05:55pm | #18

   http://www.permacolumn.com/ 

    

   "When the spirits are low, when the day appears dark, when work becomes monotonous, when hope hardly seems worth having, just mount a bicycle and go out for a spin down the road, without thought on anything but the ride you are taking." — Sherlock Holmes, 1896

10. 
    woodhak | Apr 22, 2009 04:59pm | #14

    strucurally #1 & #2 are equally strong... nothing wrong with #3 but #4 looks questionable..

11. 
    DanH | Apr 23, 2009 01:03am | #20

    What we did on our deck was to notch the top of the post, insert a piece of 5/4 decking in the notch, and then bolt the headers either side of that. This avoids creating a weak spot at the bottom of the tenon when you use the tenon method.

    The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. -John Kenneth Galbraith
1. 
   KylefromKy | Apr 23, 2009 01:48am | #22

   Hi Dan,
   Thanks for the reply.
   I'm having trouble visualizing that...you don't happen to have a photo or drawing, do you?
   "Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours."

1. 
   DanH | Apr 23, 2009 02:32am | #23

   Nothing I can do quickly. Basically, a vertical notch is made in the top of the post, as wide as the 5/4 stock is thick and maybe 8 inches deep. The 5/4 piece is inserted into the slot and thru-bolted in place, then the headers are placed on top of the post either side of the 5/4 piece and thru-bolted to it. (Obviously, with 6x6 posts you could use something thicker than 5/4, but the 5/4 worked out well for our 4x4 posts.)If you use 5/4 bullnose decking (or maybe a piece of 2x, for 6x6 posts) and use a piece that's an inch or two wider than the post it produces a fairly attractive detail.
   The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. -John Kenneth Galbraith

1. 
   KylefromKy | Apr 23, 2009 02:55am | #24

   OK, Now I see.
   Thanks!
   "Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours."

12. 
    RedfordHenry | Apr 23, 2009 05:19am | #25

    Yep, #2.  And I'd probably skip the carriage bolts and go with GRK lags. 

13. 
    mike_maines | Apr 23, 2009 05:28am | #26

    Under a short deck or somewhere looks didn't matter I'd go with #2, with 1/4" spacers as noted. 

    If this is going to be seen, I think #1 or #3 look best.  I would add 2x4 bolsters under #3 though. 

    What can I say, I like symmetry. 

1. 
   KylefromKy | Apr 23, 2009 05:32pm | #27

   Thanks for all the replies. It has been very helpful.
   I'll try to post some photos along the way. I hope to start next week!
   Kyle
   "Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours."