*
I am interested in some discussion on two methods of crawl space joist framing. The standard seems to be a mud sill bolted down to the wall with a stringer and a header, with joists nailed to the headers. The other that I have seen is to place a slot into the poured wall where ever a joist is to be hung, level with the mud sill. This method does not need a stringer or header. My questions are, what is the reason for the two styles? what holds the joists in place under method two? Can method 2 cause squeeks in the subfloor? Thanks
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story

Lighting up an exterior isn't just about ambiance— it's also about code compliance. Here is what the code says about safety and efficiency when it comes to outdoor lighting.
Featured Video
How to Install Cable Rail Around Wood-Post CornersHighlights
Fine Homebuilding Magazine
- Home Group
- Antique Trader
- Arts & Crafts Homes
- Bank Note Reporter
- Cabin Life
- Cuisine at Home
- Fine Gardening
- Fine Woodworking
- Green Building Advisor
- Garden Gate
- Horticulture
- Keep Craft Alive
- Log Home Living
- Military Trader/Vehicles
- Numismatic News
- Numismaster
- Old Cars Weekly
- Old House Journal
- Period Homes
- Popular Woodworking
- Script
- ShopNotes
- Sports Collectors Digest
- Threads
- Timber Home Living
- Traditional Building
- Woodsmith
- World Coin News
- Writer's Digest
Replies
*
I am interested in some discussion on two methods of crawl space joist framing. The standard seems to be a mud sill bolted down to the wall with a stringer and a header, with joists nailed to the headers. The other that I have seen is to place a slot into the poured wall where ever a joist is to be hung, level with the mud sill. This method does not need a stringer or header. My questions are, what is the reason for the two styles? what holds the joists in place under method two? Can method 2 cause squeeks in the subfloor? Thanks