FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

engineering “non fine” houmbuilding

JHOLE | Posted in Construction Techniques on October 19, 2007 06:16am

So I have this rental, And they needed a shed to store bikes, rakes and such.

The house is 100 years old, has basically no foundation under it, and I plan on tearing it down in +- 15 years. It is not a keeper, ( 2×4 24″ o.c. rafters, lots of hack changes over the years, etc.)

So the shed was supposed to be quick, cheap, and effective.

I decided to go with “pole barn” construction and throw a shed roof onto the house.

What’s done is done, but I would be interested in what you guys think about this approach, especially on the engineering/ structural side of things. Not so much how to do it perfect, more of is it o.k?

 

Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

Reply

Replies

  1. User avater
    popawheelie | Oct 19, 2007 06:26pm | #1

    I had a shed like that in the back yard two houses ago. They got some poles with creosote on them from somewhere and sided it with something they got somewhere else. Termites had gotten around the creosote and were quite active in it but it might still be there. I'm not sure but I seem to remember that the poles were bound together with a thick wire.

    1. JHOLE | Oct 20, 2007 02:47am | #9

      It was attached to the house and there were no problems?Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

  2. JHOLE | Oct 19, 2007 06:34pm | #2

    Some pics.

    There is more to this story but I gotta run.

    Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

    1. john7g | Oct 19, 2007 06:39pm | #3

      I've always thought that it's a challenge to half-adze something when you're not a half-adze, especially when doing your normal plan would be so out of place and out of budget.  I think you did great. 

      Edited 10/19/2007 11:39 am ET by john7g

      1. JHOLE | Oct 20, 2007 02:46am | #8

        OK, so you don't see "hack" written all over this?

        I lowered my design standards for the situation but didn't want to do something unsafe or shoddy.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

        1. dug | Oct 20, 2007 03:55am | #11

          You said you wanted it quick, cheap, and effective.

            I think you succeeded on all three. That in itself is a feat worth something.

           I see no reason to be bothered.

           I know you said this was your rental,but ya know, if you were doing this for a paying customer they would have gotten just what they wanted and were willing to pay for.

            Simple economics,.... carry on

            dug

          1. JHOLE | Oct 20, 2007 03:57am | #13

            Thanks, I'm running this by you guys to see how wrong the world is.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

        2. john7g | Oct 20, 2007 04:00pm | #16

          Nope, no Hack wirtten on it anywhere.  Hard thing to do but the existing structure usually sets the tone for style/methods to a certain degree.  Looks like you made sure it was safe enough.  What more can one ask for?

          1. JHOLE | Oct 20, 2007 04:20pm | #17

            "

            What more can one ask for? "

            Gotta get to a football game. I'll be back to answer that

             Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          2. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 03:21pm | #23

            "What more can one ask for?"

            I would guess that would depend on who you are. On Saturday the renter and I started laying the shed out, just to get a feel for what we wanted. At first I was thinking 12 x12 would do, but after laying it out and standing some posts we up'ed it to 12 x 16. Then it seemed like a good idea to just go ahead and auger the holes since it was a nice day. Probably because I do this kind of stuff for a living, I just kind of got into a stride and pieces just started poppin' together. Somewhere around nailing off the sheathing, He asks me what I think about a permit. OOps, I say to self. It was not our intension to build the thing, it just happened in the build / design phase.

            At this point I figure what the he77, it's just a shed, no safety issues, no health issues, is built to meet all loads, might as well just finish it out.

            Then as I'm putting some siding up on Monday afternoon - I get a visit from the BI. He seems to think it would be a good idea for me to pull a permit for this project.

            Tuesday morning, draw up what I've got, head down to AHJ.

            This is where it gets pretty stupid, and the reason that I would like some real world feedback on the engineering side of this little project.

            End up talking to commisioner of build/zone. Explain parameters of design, reason for use, lifespan of residence and shed.

            He explains to me that he " doesn't like the idea of two different kinds of foundation ".  He would " like to see a full foundation under this structure ". I then explain to him that if I put a full foundation under it, that I woul still end up with two different kinds of foundation - due to the 100 year old stack of bricks existing under the house. 

            In my way of thinking - after doing remodeling, GC, new construction, designing, and building structures for the last 20 + years - this design meets all acceptable requirements. Every pole barn built in this county has the same style of " foundation " .

              I have found nothing in the code that addresses this.  It does not say that all parts of a structure have to have the same foundation.  Which it would not have anyway.

            Bottom line from him is that he is " uncomfortable " and his only choice is to only approve what is in the code ( but it isn't ) or if I have an engineer's stamp that he would approve it ( he would have to since he is not an eng. )  Basically what we have here is some nimrod that doesn't really understand the real world of remodelling. He opens the code book and doesn't see a picture of this scenario and assumes that it doesn't meet code.

            I can detach this from the house, move it to a location no closer than 10' from the house, and it would require no foundation at all.

            I will not put a foundation under this thing.

            I will not go through the BS of engineering.

            How do you guys feel about the code / structural aspect of it now?

             

             Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          3. Hudson Valley Carpenter | Oct 21, 2007 06:02pm | #34

            Assuming that your poles are below frost line and padded out, as is the usual practice in my area, that should make them immune from heaving. 

             

             

          4. northeastvt | Oct 21, 2007 06:37pm | #36

            Hudson Valley Carpenter,

              What is your frost line in that area? Just curious. I grew up in the Lowville ( near Watertown),area. Nothing but sand, I haven't seen any cement block foundations in Vermont :) .

            Northeastvt 

          5. Hudson Valley Carpenter | Oct 21, 2007 07:48pm | #37

            The standard for the Mid-Hudson area is 48", bottom of footing. 

          6. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 10:27pm | #39

            That was my thought.

            won't heave and can support the load, what's the problem?

            Oh well.

            Thanks.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          7. User avater
            shelternerd | Oct 21, 2007 08:51pm | #38

            You've got a fair amount of work and material in this thing. The inspector has offered you an out to get an engineers stamp on the as-built project. It would cost me $200 to $300 to get an engineer to do a site visit and write a letter of opinion stating that the structure is acceptable to him as built. That would take the liability off the inspector, get you past the failure to pull permits, and keep you from having to tear down your shed. ------------------

            "You cannot work hard enough to make up for a sloppy estimate."

          8. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 10:44pm | #40

            I agree.

            That is/was a somewhat viable approach, but not something that I wanted to do for no reason other than someone feeling "uncomfortable".

            This kind of starts to swing into a code thing. How can you enforce a code onto people if your own code doesn't cover thier situatiion, and then just arbitrarily say that you don't like it? I have 6 neighbors ( who can actually view the property )that want/wanted it right where it is/ was.

            Keep in mind that all of the loads required by the code were met. He just didn't like the approach (but then that's not his job). What if he didn't like the color?

            I do appreciate your input, and in certain cases I'd be all over the engineer. In this case, for such a rediculous little shed, and on property that I own, I don't see why I have to prove myself to a person who doesn't know better.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          9. User avater
            shelternerd | Oct 21, 2007 10:52pm | #41

            <<I don't see why I have to prove myself to a person who doesn't know better.>>Simply because he's the chief building inspector and he can make your life miserable if he thinks you are being disrespectful to him. Choose your battles, here you can pay $300, swallow your pride and "principles" and move on with the project. Some day soon when he doesn't want you to use spray foam or do a sealed crawl or something you can go over his head and risk a confrontation. You started work without a permit, go ahead and take the out he's offered. From his perspective hes being kind to you to offer this alternative when he could have you tear the thing down and pull a permit before you start. ------------------

            "You cannot work hard enough to make up for a sloppy estimate."

          10. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 11:28pm | #42

            I gotcha.

            Well reasoned.

            I appreciate the info and effort.

            Thank you.

            That's why I threw this out there - real life problem in the building world, what should go down and why.

            You got ten years on me - this whole " drop the principle thing" must be just over the horizon. ;)Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          11. User avater
            shelternerd | Oct 21, 2007 11:43pm | #43

            I recently had a Building Inspector make me hire an engineer on a 20' x 30' carport. I have several builder friends who spent over twenty grand chasing $8,000 level claims against clients who then badmouthed them all over town. One of them ran the legal bill up towards forty grand chasing a ten thousand dollar rip-off and finally shut his business down as a result. Sometimes the principle of the thing is just a thorn keeping you up at night. I built a house for my neighbor and she never paid the last $2,600 on the bill. I realized that I would have done the job for $2,600 less and when the debt got to be six months old with no sign of payment I sent her a nice letter telling her the debt had been forgiven. She wrote back and said that she planned to pay me but was short on cash right then. I still don't understand exactly why she didn't pay me, she seems happy with the house, I know I made a good profit on it even with the missing $2,600. Just a strange thing, not worth making myself or her miserable about. It's hard to decide were to draw the line, I guess if it impacted the profitability of the job or if she had been bad-mouthing me all over town I would have talked to a lawyer. ------------------

            "You cannot work hard enough to make up for a sloppy estimate."

          12. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 11:54pm | #44

            Gotcha again, and agree again.

            I'm just goin' to have a little fun with this one. Just cause I'm in the drivers seat in my actual scenario.

            I'll keep you posted.

            Thanks.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

    2. JHOLE | Oct 19, 2007 06:48pm | #4

      oops.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

      1. JHOLE | Oct 19, 2007 06:52pm | #5

        sectionRemodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

        1. TomT226 | Oct 19, 2007 07:50pm | #6

          Why not just strip the facia off, and bevel a 2X6 screw it to the rafter tails, and nail the rafters to that?  Metal roof over purlins and a gravel bed is fine for bikes.

          Build it for about a dollar-two-ninety-eight... 

          1. JHOLE | Oct 20, 2007 02:43am | #7

            So, so far you think I over built it?

            I kind of agree, but I try to improve a site any time I'm on it.

            But structurally, you don't find anything offensive?Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          2. TomT226 | Oct 20, 2007 03:25am | #10

            Looks good to me.  If it don't fall down on my head while I'm in it, I like it.... 

          3. junkhound | Oct 20, 2007 03:57am | #12

            If it don't fall down on my head while I'm in it, I like it

            That's a good definition of a shed.  And another excuse to post my shed photo <G>.

            Kudos on a good job to the original poster on your bike/stuff shed.

            A temporary (< 20 years lifetime) should be able to be built for less than 50 cents per square foot if you stay with a dirt floor.

            The 757 sheds, the cheap shed, ofw, and the ivy shed were all built for jsut the cost of the nails, less than a nickel a foot.  The 757 sheds are over 20 years old now even. Note: 757 sheds were built from the mockup of the interior discarded in the early '80's - that's why I called 'em that.  Note the arch on the upper left segment - that arch is from inverted mockup plywood supports for 757 body sections.

            Even the 'tractor shed' was built for less than 50 cents sq ft, 100 percent free surplus materials except for most nails and the 12 ga wire and about 1 gal of roofing tar - even the garage door and opener were 'free', only cost was the gas needed to pick'em up and haul them away -owner said the company installing his new doors wanted $180 to haul off the old ones. Roof is mostly old formica kitchen countertops.

            The sheds with concrete floors probably cost close to $1 sq ft. in todays $$ due to cost of concrete.

            Watch craigslist and other websites for free building materials for sheds.

            View Image

            Edited 10/19/2007 9:04 pm ET by junkhound

          4. JHOLE | Oct 20, 2007 04:12am | #14

            Thank you.

            As the king of sheds and all things common sense that means alot.

            Especially because you can back it up with conventional education and history of what will work.

            Stay tuned.

            I will unveil how this situation played out this weekend.

            I would like to know from the people here what is wrong with what I did.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          5. northeastvt | Oct 20, 2007 08:51pm | #21

            JHOLE,

              Your post sounds like you are just begging for criticism on the shed, and you get nothing but compliments! The old 'reverse psychology trick eh? :) . The only thing I would be concerned about, would be the siding nails protruding on the inside, if there are any. Other than that, it serves it's purpose, was cost effective and will be gone in 15 years +- anyway.

            Northeastvt

             

          6. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 03:30pm | #27

            I was, and am, trying to not influence any response - in an attempt to figure out if I was right in this or if I'm all wet.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          7. northeastvt | Oct 21, 2007 05:28pm | #32

            JHOLE,

              I was just kidding around. It sounds like he is being an @#@#, because you sidestepped his "authority". If this is someone you have to deal with often, just be careful how you handle it. If you tick him off it could come back to haunt you every time you pull a permit. If it was me, I would first try telling him, "I'm sorry, I got carried away in the design stage, I know I was wrong, it will never happen again, I can't warrant spending all that money on a foundation for a bicycle shed, i'll just go ahead and tear it down, after all you are the authority!". That gives him all the "power".I wouldn't be surprised if he came back with, "Let me think it over, after all, it is only a bicycle shed,  I might be able to allow it this once". If that didn't work, then I would probably be a smart@ss, and ask him if I took the back wall out, can we call it a carport? And wanted to hook a deck to the structure, should I pour a concrete foundation, or use brick? I think he is being rather ridiculous..

            northeastvt 

          8. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 05:53pm | #33

            I agree with everything you say.

            That's kind of how it's going now.

            Thanks for some degree of affirmation, I'm just trying to see if I'm way off base.

            I have so far been consice and short, trying to stick to the facts.

            I actually don't think he has a code leg to stand on. But, I'm wrong  on the start without a permit thing. I'd be a firebomb right now if I hadn't done that.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

          9. TomT226 | Oct 20, 2007 03:06pm | #15

            All ye within the sound of my voice,  behold the "Shedman" and bow down before his magnificent creations.

            A calander would be nice 'cause you got enough "pin-ups..." 

    3. m2akita | Oct 20, 2007 11:54pm | #22

      Do you think you will have any problem with the OSB and ground contact (Im thinking moisture/water problems)?  Could wrap the bottom of the panels with something like ice & water shield. 

       Live by the sword, die by the sword....choose your sword wisely.

      1. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 03:32pm | #28

        Maybe.

        I put hardi around the bottom course.

        It will probably still wick, but even if it does, it wont cause any structural failure.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

        1. m2akita | Oct 21, 2007 04:07pm | #30

          And I guess, even if it does get wet, it should dry out pretty quick.  Are you planning on putting some type of door for the front opening?  I'd bet rez or junkhound ( I mean shedmaster) have a door that would fit just perfect!!!

           Live by the sword, die by the sword....choose your sword wisely.

          1. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 04:15pm | #31

            Yes, My plan was for a 8 x 7 OH door.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

  3. Danno | Oct 20, 2007 04:29pm | #18

    I've always wanted to build a shed out of overlapping, pre-shingled sheets of plywood--fasten the top two sides together inside to inside to form a thin ridge, use cables holding it down and spreaders to keep the two sides apart to put an ogee curve in it. Sort of an onion-dome/Quansett hut. Figured it would be cheap and would shed snow. Never got around to actually doing it. Maybe when my garage finally sinks into the ground I'll attempt it.

    1. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 03:26pm | #25

      According to my BI if your garage is buit with post construction, it will be sinking into the ground any minute now.  ;)Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

      1. Danno | Oct 21, 2007 06:12pm | #35

        All the garages in my neighborhood, I found out from talking to a neighbor, are sinking. Many, like mine, have vinyl siding, and that is being skrunched up and sort of peeled off as they sink. I spent a lot of effort several summers ago jacking up one corner and putting in new PT plates on the slab. (The wall had slid off the old, rotted plate and studs--the front wall was being supported mainly by the overhead door rails whose bottom ends were resting on the slab!) I sistered new studs and a neighbor drove up with his truck and shoved the corner back onto the slab. Two summers ago, the other corner was sinking, broken slab and all, so I jacked it up and filled with hydraulic cement and put some cedar shims under the still okay plate. But the slab is still sinking into the ground.

        Eventually I may have to lift the whole thing up and put a better foundation under it, but would probably be less expensive just to tear it down and start over (except I put a new roof on about ten years ago--and before that beefed up a column and beam that supported a sort of lean-to bump out--also made the rafters and joists into more like trusses for better support on the main part). The guy who built the house and garage was a farmer who worked at Dow--he most definitley was not a builder.

  4. User avater
    ladyfire | Oct 20, 2007 04:57pm | #19

    FWIW

    I think it looks fine. Good job. I would let you build a shed for me!

    My DH wears the pants in the family. But I control the zipper!

     

    1. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 03:24pm | #24

      Thanks, you pull the permits first.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

      1. User avater
        ladyfire | Oct 21, 2007 03:48pm | #29

        No Problem! I like having the permits.My DH wears the pants in the family. But I control the zipper!

         

  5. Hudson Valley Carpenter | Oct 20, 2007 05:09pm | #20

    IMO it's perfect solution for the requirements. 

    If you put some plastic on the ground and cover it with that coarse sand or whatever, that should keep it dry enough so that the bikes don't get rusty.

    1. JHOLE | Oct 21, 2007 03:27pm | #26

      Thanks, that's what I thought.Remodeling Contractor just on the other side of the Glass City

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander

We tried out a range of rotary and random-orbit sanders to compare their dust collection, quality of finish, and user fatigue after hours of sanding.

Featured Video

Builder’s Advocate: An Interview With Viewrail

Learn more about affordable, modern floating stairs, from design to manufacturing to installation.

Related Stories

  • Podcast Episode 685: Patching Drywall, Adding Air Barriers, and Rotted Walls
  • FHB Podcast Segment: Patching Drywall Near a Shower
  • The Unabashed Maximalist
  • A 1980s Condo Goes Retro Vintage

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2024
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers
  • Issue 327 - November 2024
    • Repairing Damaged Walls and Ceilings
    • Plumbing Protection
    • Talking Shop

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in