For cedar lap siding and trims. Best practice for long lasting solid color stain in NW Oh. climate. Back and/or face prime? Solid color stain is darn close to paint but not being a painter-no real understanding on it’s make up and penetration.
thanks.
A Great Place for Information, Comraderie, and a Sucker Punch.
Remodeling Contractor just outside the Glass City.
Replies
Faster but a little more exp. to use the solid stain as back prime. carefully applying cheaper primer to back is more time consuming..so...depends on your technique.
I'd pre stain it all , in or over a catch gutter to reclaim any slops and drips. I love solid stain over paint anyday.
Spheramid Enterprises Architectural Woodworks
Repairs, Remodeling, Restorations
"If Brains was lard, you couldn't grease much of a pan"
Jed Clampitt
View Image
Not to start a heated discussion, but -
Why is soild stain better than paint?
I have used it and since it seems to cover the grain why not just use paint?
Someone once told me that the solid stain is "absorbed" by the wood rather than "coating" the wood. Is that true?
Should the solid stain be more resistant to chipping? Does it slowly wear out as opposed to failing like paint if there is a moisture issue?
I hate to paint so I like to do the best job once and not have to deal with it again for as long as possible.
Thanks.
Yes, it won't shrink up and peel away as paint does. The film thickness is much less. And the colorant can penetrate into the surface more readily.Spheramid Enterprises Architectural Woodworks
Repairs, Remodeling, Restorations
"If Brains was lard, you couldn't grease much of a pan"Jed Clampitt
View Image
Ditto to what Sphere said. Some years ago I did an 1880's vintage store front which required almost annual repainting. Stripped it to bare wood (quite a job with all the architectural details) and used Cabot's OVT. Went ten years before it was recoated ........ faded but no chipping or peeling. Another job was a garage sided with T-111. In a shaded area, the original Olympic stain was twenty years old. Faded but in good shape otherwise. imho definitely more resistant to peeling and chipping than paint.
"There can be no doubt that Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state…Socialism is in its essence an attack not only on British enterprise, but upon the right of ordinary men and women to breathe freely without having a harsh, clammy, clumsy tyrannical hand clasped across their mouth and nostrils" -Winston Churchill
Stain does NOT peel
Its coming off in small chips on a house I resided after Ivan. Treated balusters on a deck. Small chips coming off showing the wood behind it. This is maybe a 100 feet off the Gulf. Only one section of railing. Nowhere else on the house that I've seen. It lasted almost 4 years.
Interesting...........Mill glaze??
Edited 7/18/2009 1:00 pm ET by Pelipeth
It seemed to be only one spot on the railings. Looked like it hardened, cracked and fell off. Very small pieces. smaller than half a fingernail. Just one place on the house I saw. It could be mill glaze, I built the railings but didn't do the stain.
Thanks. I understand the labor/material cost thing. Homowner labor and money.
The reason for the question I guess was in relation to the film characteristics of paint versus the penetrating nature of stain. If there's no film to be pushed off with marginal moisture passing when using stain, would priming (staining) be a wasted effort. Then when I thought about solid color stain being a whole lot like paint, became more confused.
That my friend would be the dilemma.A Great Place for Information, Comraderie, and a Sucker Punch.
Remodeling Contractor just outside the Glass City.
http://www.quittintime.com/
Been a long while ago and in a different area of the country (coastal Maine) .....we primed everything with stain. Sawhorses and a roller. Then another coat after after installation - still wouldn't do it any other way.
"There can be no doubt that Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state…Socialism is in its essence an attack not only on British enterprise, but upon the right of ordinary men and women to breathe freely without having a harsh, clammy, clumsy tyrannical hand clasped across their mouth and nostrils" -Winston Churchill
Edited 7/17/2009 8:23 am by jc21