Replies

1. 
   Lisa | Dec 17, 1998 03:38am | #1

   *
   Sneaky, Sean, very sneaky. ;-p

1. 
   J._D. | Dec 17, 1998 07:22pm | #2

   *I really hate this format. It is much easier to see the postings laid out, not this "X new messages."

1. 
   Pete_Draganic | Feb 04, 1999 08:56am | #3

   *I agree with JD. I really hate this new layout. I much preffered the old way where all msgs were listed in strings. that way I could go through and check back on replies I had made or look for comments from certain persons. Any chance you might switch back one day?Pete Draganic

1. 
   sysop_ | Feb 04, 1999 06:21pm | #4

   *nope. sorry pete, but the old board just didn't work. we get 350-400 posts per day on our boards, and it takes a monster of a database to run it all (not to mention, with 150 posts per day on breaktime alone, you'd never SEE any of the new posts before they slid right down the page). the easiest way to work with this board is to register, then start taking advantage of features like subscriptions, new messages, and your preferences. the board will keep track of what you have and haven't seen, and make it easier for you to slog through the acres of info.sean.

1. 
   andrew_d | Feb 19, 1999 08:04pm | #5

   *Still miss those followed links...

2. 
   Jim_Bunton | Mar 10, 1999 04:17am | #6

   *Really like this layout no time wasted waiting for posts to load while following a thread. Good job Thanks Jim

3. 
   Patrick_M. | Mar 11, 1999 03:39am | #7

   *What about constantly running out of page and having to figure out which one of " recent messages", "all messages", "previous messages" "earliest messages" will continue the thread and i thenwaiting for that lot to load only to have to do it all over again on some more active threads!!! What a collossal b BORE.

4. 
   The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Apr 07, 1999 04:56am | #8

   *Sean,It woould be nice if the previous related post came up with the new posts so as to know what is being yakked about....Possible?????....Please????Thanks Big Guy,J

5. 
   Rich_Beckman | Apr 20, 1999 09:34am | #9

   *Thank you, Jack.Yes, sign my name also.Rich Beckman

6. 
   sysop_ | Apr 28, 1999 09:08pm | #10

   *how 'bout if i include the message path, so you get some context?i'm getting less stupid every day...

2. 
   sean_messenger | Apr 28, 1999 09:08pm | #11

   *
   lured you in with the sensational headline, didn't i? someone had to chuck the first stone, and since i live in this here glass house...