I’m about to finish a basement in a fairly new home. The main floor is framed with 16″ floor trusses spanning about 19′. The homeowner thinks the main floor is too bouncy and wants to stiffen it up before we finish the basement. There are way too many obstructions to stiffen up the webs. I asked the truss company about plywooding the bottom, and they said it could handle the weight, but were not sure about the end results. Anyone tried gluing and screwing plywood to the bottom chord before? Will it help the problem?
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story
In this episode, listeners discuss outdoor lighting, air-barrier improvements, DIY insulation, and more.
Featured Video
SawStop's Portable Tablesaw is Bigger and Better Than BeforeHighlights
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Replies
In theory, anything (substantial) added to the bottom chord of a joist will help. If these are trusses, though, then it's hard to believe you could add enough to do much good.
What is the joist spacing, and what's the composition of the floor on top? It could be that the bounce is due to the floor flexing between joists?
Floor trusses that are 16"
Floor trusses that are 16" deep and span 19' should not have vibration in them.
That makes me wonder if something is wrong. Like if there's an off center bearing point and the trusses were installed backwards, or a center beam is undersized.
Were 2x6 strongbacks installed in the trusses? Have you asked the truss manufacturer to come out and look at them?
Someone from the truss company did come and look at them. There were strongbacks installed, but not as frequently as they should have been. They are mostly bearing on a 2x6 center wall, spaced 19.2 oc. The wall is in the proper place. They were manufactured to L370 I think, so is there any way I can beef them up after the fact? Like I said, adding anything to the sides is not an option at this point.
Any chance of getting a picture or two? Or maybe a PDF copy of the truss design?
Something is missing in this puzzle. As I said earlier, trusses with the span/depth ratio you gave should be very stiff. Much more than the L/370 figure that you mentioned.
If the trusses span 19' and have a center bearing wall, does that mean the house is 38' wide?
Is there a rectangular duct chase in the trusses? If so, where is it located, and how wide is it?
I know I'm asking a lot of questions. But I want to know what exactly the problem is before I take a crack at solving it.
Just in case you haven't been around enough to know Boss's background. Boss knows what he's talking about on trusses. Worth it to spend the time answering his questions, taking some pictures. You'll get a knowledgeable response.
Ed
Thanks
I appreciate the kind words, Ed.
I hope the OP brings some more info back so we can figure this out.
will get some shots up this weekend.
PICS UP
Pictures from right to left where the span is 19', the problem area.
You're welcome!!
Ron,
You've contributed an awful to this forum thru the years. No way for relative newcomers to know that. Given the spread of opinions that sometimes popup here, it's much better, IMO, to let people know when they're talking to a real expert.
Hope you're doing well.
Ed
Plus, having been one of the few to actually have been in the 'spec house from he11, IIRC Rons floor has 16" floor trusses. Proabably could park a loaded dump truck in the living room.
My personal method of beefing up any beam is to bolt a steel strap across the bottom face, with appropriate spacings for the lateral shear.
Art, you're actually the only one from BT that was ever in that house. So you oughta feel privileged.
(-:
The trusses in that house were actually 12", 14", and 24" deep depending on where you were at in the house. The 24" deep ones clear spanned 30' - That's why they were so deep.
JH,
I've thought of adding that a few times through the years to my living room joists just to stiffen them up a bit. Since it's not really an issue in that I don't have a bouncy floor, I've never got around to it. Just another "gonna do" on the list of things that I want to do sometime if the future, if I live long enough. How do you tension the bands? Do you jack the joists a little first??
Ed
Uh, I don't think skin ointment would make a very good glue. (Did you maybe mean resorcinol?)
I don't think that adding something to the BC would help. The trusses are plenty deep enough already.
So I'm curious why you are suggesting that.
curious why you are suggesting that
Deflection proportional to moment of inertia.
Simplistically, moment of inertia proportional to cross section area of this truss chord section, so at the least the deflection will be reduced, plus the least labor intensive method (to me at least).
With the floor on top added into the equation, the centrod of the trusses with the added BC may actually stay close to the center, providing for some additional improvement in the moment of inertia, as much as cutting deflection in half (this if the floor is glued, if not, too lazy to due the calcs on how much the centroid moves with just the BC doubled, etc, but still would guess >50% deflection reduction)
Well, obviously there's vibration because something is bending. Since this is a truss, in theory at least the "bending" would be pure compression or stretching of a member. The top chord is, we will assume as a first approximation, "quite stiff" due to the flooring. So the bulk of the elasticity must be in either the bottom chord or the the angled "truss thingies" (I'm sure there's a name for them but it's escaping me right now). Rather, let's make that: The bulk of the elasticity must be in the combination of the two. And, when considering the strength of the angled members we need to take into account the truss plates and the joints, since there's no doubt considerable motion there.
What's not clear to me is that stiffening the bottom chord would accomplish that much -- it seems to me that more elasticity is apt to be present in the angled members and the truss joints.
I wonder if we are all looking at the trusses and forgetting about the plywood above.
Could read the APA on the panels in the pics, but not the span rating. Could be just 5/8" ply above the trusses spaced on those little diamond thingys on the tape and the 'bounce' is plywood deflections vs. the trusses????
1/2 ply on 16" has detectable bounce, have to admit have never framed anything on 19.2" little blakc thingys in my life.......
I wonder if we are all looking at the trusses and forgetting about the plywood above.
Look at the very first response to this thread.
I can see where that might help if the length over depth ratio was bad. But since it isn't the problem on this truss, I don't really think it would make a difference.