FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

help needed- miter and bevel angle

ajs | Posted in Construction Techniques on August 16, 2007 05:16am

I need help with the miter and bevel angles for a fence rail that ends at a stone wall.

The fence: Picket fence with two horizontal rails, each rail a 3 by 3( 2.5 by 2.5 inch). The top of bottom rail is 8 inches above ground and the top of the top rail is 34 inches above ground.

The wall: Quarried granite, 18 inches high. From the front of the fence, the wall angles to the right at an angle of 35 degrees. The wall also is wider at the bottom than the top, it is out of plumb by 4 degrees.

The saw: I have a compound miter saw that miters 60 degrees to the right and 55 degrees to the left. The saw bevels 45 degrees both left and right.

The bottom rail will run horizontally into the wall, so I would think that I can set my miter angle to 35 degrees and the bevel to 4 degrees.

The top rail will angle downward from the post closest to wall with a downward pitch of 40 degrees. What should my miter and bevel angles be for this top rail?

I would be appreciative of either the answers or someone pointing me to the place where I can figure out the answer.

Thanks in advance.

Reply
  • X
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • pinterest
  • email
  • add to favorites Log in or Sign up to save your favorite articles

Replies

  1. ajs | Aug 16, 2007 06:56am | #1

    bump

  2. Ragnar17 | Aug 16, 2007 07:42am | #2

    ajs,

    The low tech solution would be to just grab some scrap and make a few cuts.  With each iteration you'll get closer to the right measure.

    Even if you figure out the angles mathematically ahead of time, you'll most likely need to do a little "fine tuning" because it's just so hard to get a true read on angles.

    If you could somehow post a picture, it would help a lot to visualize the problem.  Lots of guys here (myself included) like geometry problems, so you'd likely get some takers if you could get a picture up.

     

    1. ajs | Aug 16, 2007 09:05am | #4

      Thanks for the reply. I will try to attach a front, back, and top view of the project. The cut of interest is the one on the rail that angles down from the gate post, where it runs into the wall. I have changed some of the dimensions since drawing this in sketchup a few months ago, so please do not be distracted if all of those dimensions are not consistant with what I posted earlier. The pertinent numbers are:
      Rail from gatepost to wall tilts downward at an angle of 40 degrees from the horizontal
      Wall is 35 degrees from being perpendicular to the fence ( top view)
      Wall is 4 degrees from being plumb, and is wider at the base than the top. This is my first try at attaching files, so wish me luck.
      Alan

      1. Ragnar17 | Aug 16, 2007 10:15am | #5

        ajs,

        Thanks for the pictures -- I totally understand what you're doing now.

        I think the numbers I gave you in the previous post will work.  But those are hard cuts to make.  It's just about impossible to measure the length of the rail, and unless the board is cut to the actual needed length, you can't really try the angles on for size.  If I were you, I would most definitely be using some pieces of scrap to dial things in.

        1. JoeBartok | Aug 16, 2007 06:55pm | #6

          Alan I don't have time right now but I made copies of your pics to take with me and will try to get back later today with an answer. Hopefully a correct answer ... :)Joe Bartok

          1. JoeBartok | Aug 16, 2007 10:31pm | #7

            I didn't have time to type up the full analysis but here is a quick summary in case anyone disagrees with the results.

            The fence-wall intersection was treated as a Hip roof. The 40° fence slope forms the "Hip Slope Angle", 35° and 55° are the "Plan Angles". Back calculating returned the "Common Slope Angles". On the drawing these angles are sloping away (down) from our viewpoint.

            Starting with these values as givens the question is, what is the side cut angle at the peak of an unbacked Hip rafter at its intersection with a plumb wall, and the saw blade bevel required to cut such a Hip from the upper shoulder. The side cut angle would be 47.57094° ... this is the angle measured on the stick. The corresponding blade angle is 31.77203°.

            Since the wall slopes out 4° toward its foot, we subtract this value from the "natural" 31.77203°. (The blade bevel along this face normally creates an obtuse dihedral angle on the Hip, so we subtract).

            The remaining angle on the stick on the adjoining face (54.49355°) and the saw blade bevel to cut along this line (36.65247°) were solved using the standard Compound Angle Formulas.

            I think there is another approach to solving this compound angle and if I have time tonight I will try it and post the results tomorrow.

            Alan ... I didn't have time to make my own drawing so I modified yours. If you have any objection to my using your image file just give me a shout and I will remove it (or the mods can delete it).

            EDIT: Some of the angles on the drawing are incorrect. See post further down on this page.

            View Image

             

            Joe Bartok

            Edited 8/16/2007 3:33 pm ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/16/2007 3:42 pm ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/16/2007 5:10 pm ET by JoeBartok

          2. Ragnar17 | Aug 16, 2007 10:40pm | #8

            Joe,

            I'm actually pretty good with geometry, but when it comes to hip angles, you make me look like a fifth grader.  ;)

            I think there is another approach to solving this compound angle...

            I think vector calculus might work great here, but I couldn't remember how to do it if my life depended on it.

            Edited 8/16/2007 3:43 pm ET by Ragnar17

      2. rez | Aug 16, 2007 10:40pm | #9

        Is there a specific reason to end the fence rail on the stone wall instead of another post?

         

        1. JoeBartok | Aug 16, 2007 10:47pm | #10

          I went through the math kind of fast and the comparison to a Hip roof could be totally wrong. In fact the first time I attempted this I was using the side cut angle for the jack rafter (i.e., treating the fence like a backed Hip rafter) ... wrong!

          Vector math would work. I was also thinking of treating the as a "layover" type rafter where the dormer roof intersects the main roof at an irregular angle ...

          Hopefully Alan will take your suggestion to heart and try this compound angle on a piece of scrap first.

          Joe Bartok

          Edited 8/16/2007 3:49 pm ET by JoeBartok

          1. JoeBartok | Aug 16, 2007 11:59pm | #11

            Methinks I goofed. I forgot my point of view for that drawing is upside down. This means that the obtuse dihedral angle on the bottom shoulder of the Hip rafter actually decreases by the 4° slope of the wall ... so the "natural" saw blade bevel for the upper shoulder increases to 31.77203° + 4° = 35.77203°.

            The remaining angles are as follows:

            Angle on the Stick on the Adjoining Face = 45.69259°

            Saw Blade Bevel for Adjoining Face = 33.18873°

            Supplementary angles, cross section of the stick projected on the wall:

            61.88342° and 118.11658°

            Sorry about that folks! Testing this compound angle on an expendable stick sounds like a really good idea.Joe Bartok

          2. ajs | Aug 17, 2007 01:02am | #12

            Joe and Rez,
            Thanks for your responses, here is a single reply to the comments and suggestions you both have made.
            Rez, Good suggestion about the post next to the wall but there is one negative. The fence/gate is a Christmas present from me to my daughter and she wants the fence to taper to the wall.
            Joe, its fine to use my drawing, thanks for asking. I consider you to be the guru of this kind of thing, so I feel better about not finding it to be an easy problem. One of Rez's early suggestions led me to an approach which seems to work. I used Sketch-up to draw the rail and wall in their proper dimensions and orientation and then dragged the rail until it "went through" the wall. Then it was easy to use the Sketch Up tape measure to measure the length of each edge of the rail, from the rail end to the intersection with the wall. I transferred those lengths to the rail, drew my lines, and used the miter saw to cut to the lines. Then off to my daughter's house this morning ( two hour drive) to find out that the fit is just what I needed. Thanks to you both.Al

          3. JoeBartok | Aug 17, 2007 03:10pm | #13

            Alan it seems you already have an answer, but I thought about this some more last night and don't want to feel the time was wasted, so here goes. Thanks for posting this question. It was a good one and I'm going to be making a record of the solution to this.

             

            I tried making a model of this compound angle last night and it was close but not quite right. Another look at the math showed that the numbers in the original diagram were all out by about a degree.<!----><!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            There was another dumb mistake, this time a false assumption about the hypothetical “47.57094° Hip Rafter Side Cut Angle”. The edge of this angle doesn’t lie on a level line. Since the fence is sloping at 4° it is biting into this angle more and more as the fence goes downslope, increasing the “side cut” angle. So much for the hip roof math. I took a hint, played it safe and tried vector products to find the dihedral angles between the planes of interest.<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            The diagram shows only the projections of the unit vectors in plan view. Taking the arccosine of the dot products solves the dihedral angles (Vector Product Calculator). Once the dihedral angles (and hence saw blade bevels) the Compound Angle Equations can be applied to calculate the remaining angles.<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Summary of Compound Angle on the Fence:<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Angle on the Stick, Upper Shoulder = 49.53719°<!----><!---->

            Saw Blade Bevel for Upper Shoulder = 28.15265°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Angle on the Stick, Plumb Face = 54.87917°<!----><!---->

            Saw Blade Bevel for Plumb Face = 34.90233°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            This makes three different answers … third time lucky? There is another way of looking at this intersection.

             

            Be back soon …

             

            <!----><!----> View Image

            Joe Bartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:11 am ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:12 am ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:41 am ET by JoeBartok

          4. JoeBartok | Aug 17, 2007 03:17pm | #14

            Why not think of the fence as the foot of a dormer common or jack rafter meeting the main roof slope in a layover type of Valley roof?<!----><!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Calculator: Layover Rafters intersect slope of Main Roof … scroll down the page for diagrams and formulas.<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Main Roof Pitch Angle = 90°– 4° = 86°<!----><!---->

            Adjoining Roof Pitch Angle = 40°<!----><!---->

            Angle between Ridge Lines in Plan View = 35°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Set the calculator in “Pitch Angle” mode and enter those numbers. The results agree with the vector product - compound angle calcs to four decimal places … that’s close enough for me. To compare the two different methods here are the Layover Rafter Calculator returns:<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Defined (entered) Plan Angle = 35°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Angle on the Stick, Upper Shoulder of Fence …<!----><!---->

            Jack Rafter Side Cut Angle = 49.53719°<!----><!---->

            Saw Blade Bevel for Upper Shoulder …<!----><!---->

            Sleeper Bevel = – 28.15261°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Angle on the Stick, Plumb Face of Fence …<!----><!---->

            Angle on the Stick, plumb face of Adjoining Rafter = – 54.87922°<!----><!---->

            Saw Blade Bevel for Plumb Face …<!----><!---->

            Saw Blade Bevel Angle = 34.90233°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            Footprint or Mortise Angle = – 68.07796°<!----><!---->

            <!----> <!---->

            If we were mortising this fence there’s another piece of information in that calculator.<!----><!---->

            <!----><!---->

            Main Roof Sheathing Angle = 24.71838° … we lay out this angle with respect to the level upper edge of the fence. This is the reference line for the housing (or mortise) angle of 180° – 68.07796° = 111.92204°.

            Joe Bartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:18 am ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:19 am ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:19 am ET by JoeBartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 8:21 am ET by JoeBartok

          5. JoeBartok | Aug 17, 2007 03:22pm | #15

            O.K., I have edited that last message several times and "Message Truncated" keeps appearing on the board. So here's the rest of the post.

             

            If we were mortising this fence there’s another piece of information in that calculator.

             

            Main Roof Sheathing Angle = 24.71838° … we lay out this angle with respect to the level upper edge of the fence. This is the reference line for the housing (or mortise) angle of 180° – 68.07796° = 111.92204°.

             

            P.S. ... Alan, post some pics of your SketchUp solution. It's always interesting to compare notes.

            <!----><!----><!----><!----><!---->

            Joe Bartok

            Edited 8/17/2007 10:26 am ET by JoeBartok

          6. ajs | Aug 17, 2007 07:45pm | #16

            Thanks, Joe,I will try that on Sunday when I am back home and compare the lines with the ones I generated with the other method.Al

          7. dug | Aug 18, 2007 03:15am | #17

             The fence/gate is a Christmas present from me to my daughter and she wants the fence to taper to the wall.

              Just scribe it and move on or its gonna be a late present. Sometimes simpler is mo betta.

               I don't know a single carpenter that would use math to cut an angle up against a rock,... but I know 10 that would cut that angle and make it fit like it grew there in less than 2 min. :)

              dug

          8. User avater
            Brady T. | Aug 18, 2007 04:49am | #18

            Man do I agree with that. I'm not going to engineer a masonry scribe. Just get it and go.

          9. ajs | Aug 18, 2007 06:47am | #19

            Dug, If you guessed that I am a retired engineer doing carpentry and not a carpenter, you would be right. I was not able to take my miter saw to my daughter's house to do the cuts so I wanted to do them ahead of time at home, but scribing the lines on-site and doing the cuts with a hand saw would have worked just fine and been a lot faster. Thanks for the input.Al

          10. JoeBartok | Aug 18, 2007 05:28pm | #20

            Scribing would work better where irregular surfaces are concerned. I do a lot of my work with log builders ... you can't get much more irregular than that and there sure is a lot of scribing going on.

            We do use a lot of math exactly as Alan intends to use it - precutting. Especially where the roof is concerned. Most of the roof can be calculated and laid out quickly and accurately working on the relative safety of the ground.

            Here is a link to a very brief summary of the fence-sloped wall intersection formulas. Some of the terms have been redefined in terms of roof components and to "fit" other formulas on my web pages. Hopefully it's correct this time ... I've already done this wrong twice. :)

            Rafter intersects sloped Wall

            Joe Bartok

            Edited 8/18/2007 11:03 am ET by JoeBartok

  3. Ragnar17 | Aug 16, 2007 07:52am | #3

    Actually, maybe this problem doesn't need a picture after all.

    The bottom rail will run horizontally into the wall, so I would think that I can set my miter angle to 35 degrees and the bevel to 4 degrees

    Seems right to me.

    The top rail will angle downward from the post closest to wall with a downward pitch of 40 degrees. What should my miter and bevel angles be for this top rail?

    Seems you could use the same approach here as with the bottom rail.  Position the rail on the saw such that the top face of the rail is against the vertical saw fence.  Then set your primary angle on the saw to 40 degrees, and the bevel to 35.

    I'm not 100% sure this would work, so it'd be a good idea to use a piece of scrap first.  ;)

     

     

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Making the Move to Multifamily

A high-performance single-family home builder shares tips from his early experience with two apartment buildings.

Featured Video

Video: Build a Fireplace, Brick by Brick

Watch mason Mike Mehaffey construct a traditional-style fireplace that burns well and meets current building codes.

Related Stories

  • A New Approach to Foundations
  • A Closer Look at Smart Water Leak Detection Systems
  • Guest Suite With a Garden House
  • Podcast Episode 688: Obstructed Ridge Vent, Buying Fixer-Uppers, and Flashing Ledgers

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 332 - July 2025
    • Custom Built-ins With Job-Site Tools
    • Fight House Fires Through Design
    • Making the Move to Multifamily
  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2024
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

  • Home Group
  • Antique Trader
  • Arts & Crafts Homes
  • Bank Note Reporter
  • Cabin Life
  • Cuisine at Home
  • Fine Gardening
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Green Building Advisor
  • Garden Gate
  • Horticulture
  • Keep Craft Alive
  • Log Home Living
  • Military Trader/Vehicles
  • Numismatic News
  • Numismaster
  • Old Cars Weekly
  • Old House Journal
  • Period Homes
  • Popular Woodworking
  • Script
  • ShopNotes
  • Sports Collectors Digest
  • Threads
  • Timber Home Living
  • Traditional Building
  • Woodsmith
  • World Coin News
  • Writer's Digest
Active Interest Media logo
X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

Enjoy unlimited access to Fine Homebuilding. Join Now

Already a member? Log in

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in

Privacy Policy Update

We use cookies, pixels, script and other tracking technologies to analyze and improve our service, to improve and personalize content, and for advertising to you. We also share information about your use of our site with third-party social media, advertising and analytics partners. You can view our Privacy Policy here and our Terms of Use here.

Cookies

Analytics

These cookies help us track site metrics to improve our sites and provide a better user experience.

Advertising/Social Media

These cookies are used to serve advertisements aligned with your interests.

Essential

These cookies are required to provide basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website.

Delete My Data

Delete all cookies and associated data