FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

How to fix this GSHP problem?

CloudHidden | Posted in Energy, Heating & Insulation on March 2, 2007 06:05am

Can you read through this and tell me if anything pops out? It’s notes from a client of mine in Ohio. My house design work was done long ago, and he’s close to moving in, but he’s having all kinds of HVAC (geothermal) trouble. He has about 4000-4500 sf in the residence. He has three 150′ wells w/ a 3 ton ClimateMaster heat pump…we had an 800′ well and a 4 ton GSHP. Would that alone be enough to super-chill the water in the pipe, as he is seeing?

#

Well, I have good news and bad news.

The good news is that yesterday my house became an electric generating utility, when its PV panels and wind turbine came online. No sun then, but the 3100 watt PV array generated around 500 watts anyway in the cloudy and snowy weather. The wind turbine was intermittently producing power as the wind alternately went above and below its 7 MPH cut in wind speed.

The bad news has to do with what can only be called my clown HVAC people. My geo thermal heatpump is freezing up the ground source loop, giving a 31 degree source water temperature, on a day when the air temp is around 34 and the ground temp at 150 feet should be around 50 degrees. Can’t get very much heat out of that. I’m running my buffer tank resistance element again to keep up, which allows the compressor to cycle on and off, allowing the geo loop to ‘recharge’ in order to be able to withdraw more heat later. Basically my three 150 foot vertical wells don’t have enough capacity to feed the 3 ton compressor. This could be due to three reasons that I’ve come up with. Just not enough pipe in the ground, the fact that they back filled the wells just by hand shoveling the drilled out rock dust back into the well, possibly leaving insulating air voids, or that they didn’t connect the three wells in parallel using reverse return connections, resulting in uneven flow in the three wells. My HVAC guys told me to give them my load study, even though that has nothing to do with this problem. I don’t think they understand how a heat pump works.

#

I found out yesterday that geo wells are supposed to be grouted, and mine wasn’t. I don’t have the details on what geo well grouting is, but I’ve heard it involves bentonite, which is an expanding clay. I have a new set of HVAC guys hot on the trail. More $$$$$. Heavy sigh.

#

I found out that the State of Ohio requires all wells to be grouted, so that surface water cannot contaminate the lower level ground waters. Thus our drillers are in violation by not grouting our wells. After asking around, I’ve found out that other geo thermal drillers have been following behind the guys that did ours, fixing their problems. These guys were hired as subs by my HVAC guys.

My HVAC guy also had the same guys drill his wells, 5 of them for his 5 ton installation. He is also having the same problems I am. He is arranging a meeting with me, him, and the Climate Master heat pump rep, so that he can understand what’s going on.

Ultimately, I’m going to need one or more wells to make up for the current poor performance. I can see a battle in my future.

If the incoming water temp is too low, the coefficient of performance of the heat pump starts to approach that of resistance heating. Yikes. I can feel the breeze from my electric meter spinning.

#

We have a 3 ton Climate Master Genesis Series GSW036, water to water heat pump. We have three wells, each 150 feet deep, mostly into limestone and sandstone. Plastic U piping in each well, hopefully connected in a reverse return connection, although I don’t know this for certain. We are running a 25% ethanol, water solution in the geo loop.

Instead of proper grouting, they hand shoveled the drilled out rock dust back down the 6″ bore. I can’t imagine that filled the bore well, and there is probably plenty of air voids. I’m told when properly grouted, the contractor lowers a pipe to the bottom of the well and pressure pumps a grouting mix of bentonite or concrete until it comes out the top. Then his fill pipe is withdrawn. I’m told it’s difficult to grout a well after the fact, since they cannot get the grout piping thru the backfill to the bottom of the well.

I’ve been in contact with the Ohio E.P.A. on well contruction requirements and they are emailing me a detailed summary of the requirements.

When it was 35 deg F outside, I was getting 31.4 deg F source water and 26 deg F return water in the geo loop. I’m having difficulty maintaining 100 deg F in my 50 gallon buffer tank. My load is three Unico M1218 1-1.5 ton air handlers using the water based cooling coil as both heating and cooling. Flow from the heat pump to buffer tank is about 12 GPM with its own pump, and from the buffer tank to each air handler is about 4 GPM each, with each air handler having its own pump. The three air handlers have their own thermostat and come on randomly relative to each other. Thus I can have any where from 0, 1, 2, or 3 air handlers running. The heat pump runs independently of the air handlers, maintaining the buffer tank temperature. My Energy Star load study came up with a heating requirement of 36,300 BTU/Hr. My HVAC guy sent me a local study on the geo system that says that I should have an average (not sure the definition of average here) supply temperature of 46 deg F, with a minimum of 36 deg F.

At the low buffer tank temp, my three air handlers are on all the time, and so is the heatpump, freezing up the geo loop. I’m now running with the 4.5KW heating element in the buffer tank on, so that the heat pump cycles on and off, allowing the wells to ‘recharge’ somewhat. This brings my buffer tank up to 120 deg F, and the airhandlers don’t run all of the time. But as you say, Jim, I’m feeling the financial pain of resistance heating.

I have a meeting scheduled with the Climate Master rep with my HVAC guy next Tuesday.

#

Unfortunately in my situation my heat pump source water temperature is not dominated by the average ground temperature. My heatpump is trying to extract heat from a limited capacity well set faster that the conductivity of the surrounding earth can restore it. This is resulting in localized cooling of the ground, down to 30 deg F or less, which is a much lower temperature than the average ground temperatures in our area. I suspect I have two problems, not enough total geo loop length, ie, not enough wells, or not deep enough wells, and the wells I have are not properly grouted, and posess air gaps around the tubing, limiting the heat transfer from the earth to the circulating water. Air pockets are great insulators. So, warmer outside temperatures should result in less heatpump run time, and therefore less localized cooling of the geo wells, allowing them to warm up to a higher average temperature. I’m sure the lag of the average ground temperature, as you mention, is also a complicating factor.

lI’m meeting with the president of the HVAC company I’m using and the Climate Master heat pump rep tomorrow morning. The HVAC company sent a guy out to my house today to check some system pressures, and to also clip a programming jumper wire that would change the geo water source low temperature cutoff for the heat pump down to 10 degrees F from the current 30 degree setting. How’s that for solving the problem? I quickly vetoed cutting that wire. Allowing the heatpump to operate in an even less efficient condition does not fix my system.

With average winter air temperatures what they are here in Cincinnati, I’d be better off using an air source heatpump. There is no advantage to using the more expensive geo thermal heatpump if my source water temp is going to be 10 degrees F. Heavy sigh! These guys just don’t get it. How can they be in this business with such a lack of understanding of how their product works?

#

I had the meeting with the heat pump rep and the HVAC big cheese this morning. The HVAC company had made some pressure measurements on the system yesterday, and the rep analyzed them. He concluded that 1. The geo loop had a flow rate of 5 GPM, and the minimum spec for the heat pump is 3 GPM per ton, or 9 GPM for my 3 ton unit. 2. That the refrigerant pressures were way off, indicating that the refrigerant was low or contaminated with what he called non condensables. Because of all his, my heatpump was only generating 1 1/2 tons of heating instead of the spec’d 3 tons.

So, tomorrow the HVAC guys are going to empty my refrigerant, evacuate the lines, and refill it with new refrigerant to spec. Then a second pump will be added to the geo loop pump assembly, as it has a mounting provision for the second pump to increase the loop flow rate. The rep also admitted that the wells should have been grouted, and that not grouting is a violation of state law.

I’ll get the heat pump hardware working properly first, and then fight the well war. At least there is a smoking gun to work with.

#

I was looking at Climate Masters website and it said vertical wells need to be from 150 to 250 feet deep per ton. I wonder if I’ll need to have them made deeper than the 150 feet they are now?

#

The HVAC guys emptied the refrigerant and reloaded new stuff. It apparently works better now according to their measurements, but the geo loop still has frost on it inside the house. The wells suck. The now more efficient heat pump is placing a higher demand on the wells. Oh ya, the boneheads forgot to bring the second geo loop pump that’s needed to bring the system up to the manufacturer’s specs. Worthless.

#

Looks like they’re at the absolute minimum at 150 feet for each my three wells, plus the fact that they didn’t grout them. Add to that not meeting the flow spec through the loop, but at least they’ve agreed to add the extra pump to fix that.

I need to try and get my existing wells grouted, if that’s even possible now. I’ll probably still need at least one more well, and more if I can’t grout my existing wells.

#

Once they increase the geo loop flow to the manufacturer’s spec, the wells will be even further taxed. Hopefully then it will be obvious to my bonehead HVAC guys that the wells need to be fixed. I have a bad feeling that they won’t be able to pull the tubing out. But still, I guess it would be easier to just redrill through the tubing and ground rock dust and then re tube and grout. We’ll see how it goes.

Reply

Replies

  1. joeh | Mar 02, 2007 08:33pm | #1

    My uneducated eye sez he's right about the wells. The lose fill will not conduct heat, and he's right they will have to redrill to fix it.

    He's also right that he's dealing with clowns.

    Sounds like lawyers are in his future unless the HVAC contractor is willing to fess up & fix it at no charge.

    Bet his electric bill is more than Al Gore's by now.

    Joe H

     

  2. Locke | Mar 02, 2007 08:40pm | #2

    CloudHidden,

    It sounds like he is on the right track about the wells, it could be a compound problem of not enough length and very poor installation resulting in poor conductivity.

    The last time I was involved with a geothermal borehole design (in Northern MI) we first had a test well dug and soil conductivity tests run on that hole.  My understanding is that published data for soil conductivity is fine to get a first guess, but there is so much variation from one location to another that you really need to determine the actual conductivity at your site prior to determining the total length of piping (and therefore number & depth of holes).  If his "clowns" didn't backfill correctly I would highly doubt they did a test well & found out the conductivity.

    After determining the conductivity, finding your total length is also not as straightforward as it might seem at first.  I think some of the manufacturers have tables to operate off of, but the actual calculation invoves transient heat flow accounting for thermal mass and can be greatly affected by the distance between the boreholes.  When we designed our system we used a software package developed by a prof from OK State called GLHE PRo that was sophisticated enought to determine what your average return temp from the field would be once it had stabilized for the season (if you are undersized it could be significantly different from the average soil temp).  You can get a link to the software here: http://www.igshpa.okstate.edu/publication/software.htm

    Note, its not cheap, but its a whole lot less expensive than having to add more borholes because you underestimated based on generalized tables...

    GSHP's are an excellent product and can be a huge energy savings as compared with traditional HVAC equipment, but there is definitely a learning curve associated with their design & installation.  It pays to go with someone with some experience, or if you are the one doing the work for the first or second time - learn as much as you can by talking with others who are experienced before finalizing the work...

    Hope this helps...

     

  3. Porsche998 | Mar 02, 2007 09:45pm | #3

    Your system is somewhat more complex than the Climatemaster that I just started up - a Tranquality 27 3 ton unit for 1600 sq ft.  It uses the well water and reinjects.  My design included a bleed of 1 gpm overboard when the water temp. fell to 38 deg.  My normal flow is 9 gpm.  Once i balanced the bleed, the system worked like a charm.  Balancing took some work as if too much was bled off the well would run dry and the aux electric heat would come on.  Too little and the well temp would drop too much.  Woring great now - will be using the system desuperheat to supply domestic hw requirements next.  Place is in cental NH. Well is about 500 feet deep with the head about 150 feet bgs and supplies about 4 gpm.  Good luck.

    1. DickRussell | Mar 06, 2007 01:04am | #5

      Porche, who did your system design? The outfit in Atkinson (Water Energy Dist, I think they're called)? I'll be doing a similar setup (Standing Column Well, SCW it's called) up in Moultonborough in a couple of years, and I'm thirsty for all the info I can get on GSHP. Your setup seems to jibe with what I have read for this design, that you need around 100 feet of well water depth (between draw and return levels) per ton of heat load. I imagine that with limited water supply, getting the bleed rate right is critical. Perhaps the solution would be to have gone deeper, so the return water has longer time to recover temperature. What did the designer have to say on that?

      Another question: that 3 ton capacity - what did the building envelope calc show for a peak demand? I am curious as to how they select the heat pump capacity vs. the peak load.

      Edited 3/5/2007 5:07 pm ET by DickRussell

      1. junkhound | Mar 06, 2007 02:04am | #6

        What diameter wells?

        Casing?

        water depth (if any) in the wells?

        Need that info for the "fix", but poor heat transfer as already mentioned is likely the cause.

        If this were in WA state, there would likely be big trouble with DNR inspection 'folks' once they knew the backfill was pourous - as in $$$$ like pull/redrill/fill, drillers would lose license here. 

      2. User avater
        CloudHidden | Mar 06, 2007 02:50am | #7

        >what did the building envelope calc show for a peak demand?I calced closer to 4 ton, but was conservative in assumptions. When the Energy Star tests were being done and the results of the blower door tests, etc. came back, that contractor came up with 3 ton. Apparently the owner and hvac contractor went with all the minimums--btu/h requirements, well depth to achieve those btu/h, etc.

      3. Porsche998 | Mar 06, 2007 05:27pm | #8

        I did the design myself (am a ME PE) and installed myself (registered EPA license) - Water and Energy worked with the well driller to provide adequate water flow.  Matt Oreo there knows all the ins and outs.  Design called for about 34K BTUs with 65 deg. delta T.  added same amout of elect. heat in the duct to take care of times below zero and for backup to the HP.  has worked great. 

        1. DickRussell | Mar 06, 2007 05:59pm | #9

          So that 3 ton capacity is barely over the calculated 34K BTU/hr. Interesting. I suppose, then, that on a day like today the HP is running full time, eh? I'm curious as to what your inlet water temperature is. Any numbers on COP? Have you run in AC mode in the summer yet? How is capacity vs. calculated cooling load & dehumidification?

          1. Porsche998 | Mar 09, 2007 04:06pm | #11

            Inlet temp is about 44 deg.  The heat pump runs continously at about 0 deg F outside.  Below that the electric heat kicks in.  I ran the AC last summer as a test but did not run any performance.  From my memory the KW required for cooling were a lot lower.  In NH, the temps do not really require AC but is nice to have on those humid days especially.  The sizing will give the ability to dehumidfy without over cooling.  There is also a dehumidifation setting on the Climatemaster.

  4. DanH | Mar 02, 2007 10:15pm | #4

    Not that familiar with many of the issues here, but it raises a good point that ANY time you bore a well you should check with the authorities first to find out what's legal in your area. Even in rural areas well drilling is often subject to significant regulations.

    So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable Creature, since it enables one to find or make a Reason for everything one has a mind to do. --Benjamin Franklin
  5. User avater
    SamT | Mar 06, 2007 08:23pm | #10

    "Instead of proper grouting, they hand shoveled the drilled out rock dust back down the 6" bore."

    Main problem right there. An enormous loss of overall system efficiency.

    SamT

    Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either. [Einstein] Tks, BossHogg.

  6. IdahoDon | Mar 09, 2007 07:49pm | #12

    What really pops out is the client is doing an awful lot of guessing and secondguessing, often drawing conclusions with no evidence to support what he's saying.

    I see the same problem with many clients using gut feeling and very little knowledge of the technology to intelectualize problems and draw conclusions.  Gut feelings only work if the person has experience in an area.

    In the notes I see refferences to the HVAC guys being poo pooed for saying one thing, then later there is a refference that actually supports them.

    I would call bs on drawing any conclusions about the situation other than saying we don't have nearly enough information.  I have no desire to learn enough about geothermal heat pumps to troubleshoot an application, but it's clear enough that the methodology used to critiqe the HVAC guys and their subs is totally off base.

    If it were my job I'd sit down with the HVAC guys and spell out a plan that presents a more professional approach to finding out what's wrong and fixing it, even if that means bringing in someone else to troubleshoot it all.  I'd also ask the client to not draw any more conclusions because they aren't an expert and it's just not productive.

    The one fact that we are sure of is that those notes are very one sided and it leaves little evidence of what the HVAC guys are actually doing, and what they have actually tried.  The client doesn't know, what he doesn't know.

    Good building.

     

    Beer was created so carpenters wouldn't rule the world.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Putting Drywall Sanders to the Test: Power, Precision, and Dust Control

A pro painter evaluates a variety of drywall sanders and dust collection systems for quality of finish, user fatigue, and more.

Featured Video

How to Install Cable Rail Around Wood-Post Corners

Use these tips to keep cables tight and straight for a professional-looking deck-railing job.

Related Stories

  • A Summer Retreat Preserved in the Catskill Mountains
  • Fine Homebuilding Issue #332 Online Highlights
  • The Trump Administration Wants to Eliminate the Energy Star Program
  • Podcast Episode 685: Patching Drywall, Adding Air Barriers, and Rotted Walls

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2024
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers
  • Issue 327 - November 2024
    • Repairing Damaged Walls and Ceilings
    • Plumbing Protection
    • Talking Shop

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in